"May I ask what you think you accomplished by saying all this?"
Well, uh, duh, I have a view of this-you asked & now you may read it. Please ignore anything which smacks of reality or does not fit your scenario-Cheerio! Carry on mate!
I find these selective responses to be humorous. The folks that make them try to pass off them off as reasoned. Look, if that line was all I said on the subject, you're response might be termed reasoned. Let's review what else I said.
I could link you to hundreds of posts, if not thousands of posts on this forum that have said nearly the exact same thing you have here. All of it has been repeatedly posted here. And you know what, every conservative on this forum agrees with your take on it.
All this being true, is Schwarzenegger a racist separatist? Does it even bother you that California government would be infiltrated by literally thousands, if not tens of
thousands of appointees who are over the 12.5 years, the possible term of the next governor.
If McClintock can't win, can you live with yourself knowing you facilitated Cruz Bustamante becoming governor? That's what it all boils down to. It doesn't boil
down to you converting me to be a McClintock supporter. I already am. Every conservative on the forum is. You are trying to win a battle that is already won.
This is only part of what else I said. The last part in blue is especially poignant. It explains why it's futal for you to keep repeating the same old stuff over and over and over and over and over and over, as if it's a brand new breath of fresh air. It's isn't. It's a stail horse dropping that everyone is already familiar with and recognizes for what it is. Enough already.
WE AGREE. McClintock is the best candidate. What part of that do you think you understand that nobody else does? Your comments are a complete waste of time.
A wee small suggestion: perhaps in future, you might advise when you want to screen all posts via Freep-mail? I shall just ignore your inquiries in future.
There you go. It just doesn't register with you.
WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock. WE AGREE ABOUT McClintock.
Damn, how many times do you think you have to repeat that McClintock is the better candidate? Everyone agrees with you. Still you start all over explaining why McClintock is the better candidate?
Earth to GatekeeperBookman. Please. Tell us one more time how McClintock is better than Arnold. Then sit down and try to look at this objectively for the first time in your life. McClintock may not be electable. Neither you and I can wave a wond and make that reality. It either happens or it doesn't. If it doesn't, please at least consider preventing Bustamante from becoming governor.
25 posted on 08/24/2003 5:24 PM PDT by GatekeeperBookman (impossible and radically idealist notions; strict constructionist; prickly; quarrelsome.)