Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Commandments on Display Has No Legal Standing
sierratimes.com ^

Posted on 08/24/2003 10:14:36 AM PDT by Timothy Paul

Ten Commandments on Display Has No Legal Standing By J.J. Johnson Please excuse the shocking title of this article. I will try to get past much of the rhetoric from both sides of the standoff about the en Commandments on display at the State Courthouse in Montgomery, Alabama. As thousands descend to Alabama's state capitol for prayer and defense of a 5300 pound rock, and legal scholars try to sort out the mess, many pundits wonder 'just what point is Chief Justice Roy Moore trying to make?' Well, here's one man's take on the matter: Despite all the historical documents from this nation's beginning, and despite everything we were taught from a young age, we are a more 'enlightened' people. We elected more 'enlightened' politicians who in turn appointed more 'enlightened' judges. And these all knowing, all powerful people, having more information at their fingertips than at any time in world history, have ruled that the basic rules of mankind that have been in place for at least 50 centuries have no place ; no legal standing in today's government.

...and that is the exact point Roy Moore is making.

The order to remove the Ten Commandments from public display at the Alabama Court Building is not the cause of a failed government, failed courts, or a failed people - it is instead, the result of it.

I will do my best here not to preach a sermon or sound like a right-wing zealot, but no one can tell me what is 'offensive' about those ten rules that are, in reality, the foundation of what was American law. But that's ancient history. We are more 'enlightened' today.

Being the greatest and most powerful country on earth, we don't need silly rules such as those ten. No, we have government today - which has become the new god. And we have finally come to a point where there just isn't enough room on the Grand Stage for two gods. Thus, the courts have consistently ruled in recent days that the 'Other God' must go.

And so, what if God does leave? What if he actually said, "ok, you guys win - and you're on your own"? That would make us a better country, wouldn't it?

Of course. And when folks like Jerry Falwell makes a statement on September 11 implying the God has removed his protective hand from us, we won't have to chastise him - since it would have been true.

And after such tragedies, we won't have national days of prayer, and prayer sessions in Congress while grieving over the dead because there will be no God to pray to. We told Him to get lost, remember? No, let us bow our heads and pray (and pay homage) to the New god of government. They will protect us from now on, and provide for all of our needs.

Let's not sing God Bless America anymore, since we really don't want him to. That's George W. Bush's job now. And let's remove "In God We Trust" from our currency, since we really don't trust him anymore. We've placed our faith in our money supply to Alan Greenspan.

And when it comes to religious symbols, we do our best to protect those in the war zone of Iraq, while throwing our own in the trash.

Makes perfect sense to me.

Word has it that a guy named Moses had gotten these ten rules straight from God himself. Even though e-mail wasn't around back then, God somehow downloaded them on to a couple of stone tablets. When Moses came back down from that mountain and saw the folks that were led out of slavery acting like too many of us today, he threw the tablets down, and they were forced to wander in the desert for 40 years.

But today, in the more enlightened America, we don't have to wander in the desert. We have military personnel to do that for us. And little by little, more will go and wander as well. You see, we have a new god now, and the whole world has become a desert.

So if and when we are plagued with earthquakes, violent storms, endless droughts, brushfires, or just people going crazy and shooting their co-workers or schoolmates, we'll call them "Acts of God", then plead to our new god (government) for our protection from all of these things. Yes, this new god is more to our liking. We can pray, and if the new god doesn't deliver, we can just vote him out of office (federal judges not withstanding). That Old God wouldn't let us do that.

Isn't it ironic that if everyone simply followed those rules, it would make not only that 5300 pound rock, but that entire building itself - irrelevant?

With the polls showing upwards of 77% of Alabamians, and the vast majority of Americans supporting the Ten Commandments being displayed at the courthouse, people are scratching their heads wondering, "why can't they just do what the majority wants?"

Answer: Because we asked for this.

We have long since slipped away from those tenants - and it's reflected in the people in government that represent us, enforce the laws, and rule on the laws. Yes, America - we didn't get the kind of government we wanted, nor the kind we needed. We get the kind of government we deserve.

We have become so 'enlightened' that we don't even know how to respect or enforce our own sovereignty. Millions cross our national borders illegally, and our leaders don't even have the will to call it illegal. As a result, we will eventually lose at least 4 southwestern states. I have all but given up trying to make it an issue anymore. We deserve it.

We have become so 'enlightened' that the only criteria for any judge to sit on a bench, despite all the other important decisions they have to make, depends on his or her willingness to sanction the killing of the unborn. Fine. We didn't want them to take the phrase "Thou shall not kill" seriously, anyway.

We have become so 'enlightened' that we fight to protect retirement schemes that we know will go broke soon, but that's okay since we've decided to let our grandchildren pay the bill. Then again, if they have no respect for that "Honor thy Father and Mother" thing when they grow up, why should they bother taking care of us?

We are so 'enlightened' that we find it acceptable to act pre-emptive, killing anyone we see fit to keep us safe, if we think they are a threat. Make sense, since we don't want God's protection anymore. We have to live this way now. We have enemies all around us and even within us we are told - because they envy us. They don't have the new god that we have, and they're jealous.

Gay Bishops are in, Boy Scouts are out, and sodomy has become a civil right, protected by the Constitution somewhere. Okay, I get it. According to our new god, the oldest industry on earth (agriculture) has become the most dangerous to the environment. And we all know that with all the craziness in schools these days, the last thing we need is prayer inside those buildings. Good thing we threw God out of there a long time ago. Just look at how much schools have improved since then.

Yes, for government's sake - let's get those Ten Commandments out of public view before something good happens.

And while we're at it, let's get all those crosses out of Arlington Cemetery. It's public property, you know. And tell all of our troops fighting overseas that worship service is history, turn in those pocket Bibles and as a matter of fact, they must all be atheists in those foxholes.

Let's do it right: Let us all come to an agreement that when the Bill of Rights was passed, they had no respect for any god, despite the fact that the Constitutional Convention was opened and closed with a Prayer to Almighty God. To Congress: Fire that priest we pay with our tax dollars to open and close each session of Congress with Prayer. We have a new god now, remember?

And one more thing: Let's not support Israel anymore, since their presence in the holy land is based on scripture, and our government's support would represent an 'establishment of religion'.

Hey ACLU and SPLC: Wanna take THAT one on?

Now, as for those people who have dedicated themselves to prevent the monument's removal, and those who have rallied to the cause - take a good look at them. That's what's left of the American ideal that was founded over two centuries ago - like it or not.

Make no mistake about it. If it weren't for too many trips already taken this year, I'd be there myself from 2000 miles away. Who knows - if the standoff in Alabama lasts, I may still be there. If I lived anywhere in Dixie, I would be writing this article from Montgomery.

Would I suggest others go? Let's put it this way: You don't even have to be a Christian, Jew or even a Muslim. God knows none of us have lived up the standards of all those rules, but it you believe the Ten Commandments should REMAIN the foundation on which this country is based, then take a drive down to Montgomery. Your fellow Americans are waiting for you.

And what about you, Mr. Bush? The silence from the White House is deafening. Is this only a "state issue" where the federal government should not get involved? If that were the case, we wouldn't be in this mess. I would not only pray for protection of the Ten Commandments, but that the President, during his fund raising travels, make a stop in Montgomery to visit with the Chief Justice, or maybe the people standing vigilant outside.

Odds are, they all voted for George W. Bush.

You see America: There is no sense looking for a legal loophole to save the Ten Commandments anymore, as God has no legal standing left in today's courts, government, or much of society. But the way things look from my piece of the world, perhaps it's time we invited Him back.

Just my opinion,

J.J. Johnson


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2003 10:14:36 AM PDT by Timothy Paul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul
Will someone please notify God that the ten commandments have no legal standing.
2 posted on 08/24/2003 10:17:09 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul
And while we're at it, let's get all those crosses out of Arlington Cemetery. It's public property, you know.

There's an idea. Have somebody sue to remove those crosses and see what the court says then.

3 posted on 08/24/2003 10:45:05 AM PDT by greydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul
AT some risk to my flame proof drawers.....

Separating religion from politics IS a big deal - ever wonder why the “prods” and “catholics” (lower case intentional) get by in the good old US of A, when back in the old country- they are willing to kill each other? Because one controls the levers of government - very visible, very much in your face.

That kind of silliness is not really tolerated here, one (specific) sect does not rule...Not convinced? - witness India, Pakistan, Shia vs Sunni, and on and on. Bad news all-around.

Do I agree with the ACLU? Nope, Just making a point that some folks may see the "rock" as more of a threat than you kind souls born and raised in the USA and as a member of the dominate sect....... Please think before you flame, and if you must flame, please do so in a private reply. No reason to tie up the board....


4 posted on 08/24/2003 10:45:17 AM PDT by ASOC (Think before you hit SEND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul
Wow!

Just finished saving this into my archives for a longer and more thorough reading.

5 posted on 08/24/2003 10:48:19 AM PDT by capt. norm (The sooner you fall behind the more time you'll have to catch up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
The former USSR, China, N. Korea...these are the examples you're looking for, for that is where religion and politics are separated, by law.

In the US, the battle is not about the separation of church and state, it's about the prohibition of religion on any public lands.
6 posted on 08/24/2003 10:51:01 AM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul
I agree. Click below. Sometimes satire and humor are "the best attack on a public humbug," as Mark Twain wrote.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "In the Justices We Trust?" posted on FR, other publication to come.

7 posted on 08/24/2003 10:56:06 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Don't just stand there. Run for Congress." www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul; Spiff; HiJinx
Gay Bishops are in, Boy Scouts are out, and sodomy has become a civil right, protected by the Constitution somewhere. Okay, I get it. According to our new god, the oldest industry on earth (agriculture) has become the most dangerous to the environment. And we all know that with all the craziness in schools these days, the last thing we need is prayer inside those buildings. Good thing we threw God out of there a long time ago. Just look at how much schools have improved since then.

Let's simplify the equation, shall we?

Evil and perversion are in and following the tenet of "As for me and my house we follow the ways of the LORD!" are out.

Band together and change this now or suffer the penalty of heaven, as did the residents of Sodom and Gomorrah!

8 posted on 08/24/2003 11:01:42 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
aclu shariaist ... ussc mullahs --- ayatollas ?
9 posted on 08/24/2003 11:12:04 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
"Separating religion from politics IS a big deal - ever wonder why the “prods” and “catholics” (lower case intentional) get by in the good old US of A, when back in the old country- they are willing to kill each other? Because one controls the levers of government - very visible, very much in your face."

The problem is that the First Amendment does not mention "separating religion from politics", nor does the Constitution in general. It says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

In short, it is a restriction on the Federal Congress from making laws regarding religion; it does not say that a courthouse in Alabama cannot display the Commandments.

This is simple English. I repeat: NOWHERE in the Constitution is anything that requires "separation of religion from politics."

--Boris

10 posted on 08/24/2003 11:20:29 AM PDT by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
In the US, the battle is not about the separation of church and state, it's about the prohibition of religion on any public lands.

Correction: It is the prohibition of a particular religion on public lands. The 10 Commandments are on display in the Texas Supreme Court building, the US Supreme Court building, and other public buildings.

Moore was never interested in the 10 Commandments on display; his rock is about Roy Moore's definition of religion. Check out what he thinks about Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists, and that they have no rights in this country except those rights given to them by the Judeo-Christian religion.

Warped.

11 posted on 08/24/2003 11:20:50 AM PDT by sinkspur (God's law is written on men's hearts, not a stone monument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
From the link: I pledge allegiance to the Supreme Court of the United States, and to the Republic which it controls, one nation, under nobody in particular, with liberty and justice for all (or at least for all who can get five Justices to buy their argument).”

LOL. I was thinking along the same lines when I read this article. LOL. Judge Moore just might be the political re-incarnation of John Brown.

I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me the Supreme Court.

Is it not true that all judges take an oath to office and invoke God in that oath? What a deilemma - Denounce God yet defend the right to the office.

12 posted on 08/24/2003 11:24:36 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (The violation of the tenth commandment will lead to violation of the other nine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
Will someone please notify God that the ten commandments have no legal standing.

I'm happy to notify YOU that most of the 10 Commandments not only have no legal standing here, but OUGHT NOT have legal standing in any civilized country.

Check out the first four:

1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

These might apply where the Taliban rules, but they have no business being enforced in this land of the free.

13 posted on 08/24/2003 11:24:46 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
Separating religion from politics IS a big deal - ever wonder why the “prods” and “catholics” (lower case intentional) get by in the good old US of A, when bac..........

I understand your point, and share the thought that religions often misbehave and kill each other in the name of God. but you are overlooking something.

the constitution never envisions a separation of church and state. This was a invention of the courts in the early sixties. we have seen the degradation of our foundations ever since.

The point is that government was prohibited from endorsing or prohibiting any religion. As such, it was never intended that it could prohibit the display of a reference to God. Their is no religious context to the commandments, only a reference to laws passed down by the almighty that nearly all religions endorse. The suit was brought by atheists who do represent a religion by definition. The ten commandments do not.

IMHO

14 posted on 08/24/2003 11:28:01 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Nothing in my home is French!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan; sinkspur
Handchoppers ... you !
15 posted on 08/24/2003 11:28:50 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Their is no religious context to the commandments

The first four are specficially about a specific God and a specific religion:

1. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

4. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

16 posted on 08/24/2003 11:39:14 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timothy Paul
J.J. Johnson, as usual, hit it dead on. Brings to mind an incident I had with a liberal a couple of years back. I posted an article in a political chat room that was more derogatory of President Bush than even most of what we see out there right now. (It wasn't an article I accepted, btw). But it was interesting dynamic to note that in light of that article, one of his harshest critics in the chat room came to his defense. Just thought I'd share.
17 posted on 08/24/2003 11:39:48 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
You remind me of the first time I heard of bloodletting ... lobotomies --- QUACKS !
18 posted on 08/24/2003 11:43:12 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Handchoppers ... you !

Whassamatta U.

19 posted on 08/24/2003 11:43:31 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Oh ...

the hierachy of Truth ... the top is missing - buried ---

you got it upside down ... again !
20 posted on 08/24/2003 11:47:08 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson