To: nwrep
Tom McClintock
Tough to come remotely close to being seriously considered at all by any but the most conservative of CA voters.
Besides, he comes across as smug and a bit condescending.
Arnolds comes across as being or having been 'one of us.'
Which do you think the mass of voters will align with the easiest? . . . will vicariously identify with the easiest?
52 posted on
08/23/2003 9:19:08 AM PDT by
Quix
(DEFEAT her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de MarxNOW)
To: Quix
"Arnolds comes across as being or having been 'one of us.'"
You mean a DU type ?
57 posted on
08/23/2003 9:20:33 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: Quix
"Arnolds comes across as being or having been 'one of us."
I am not a CA voter, so my opinion doesn't count and I know that - but what you wrote above is the funniest thing I have ever heard in my life, unless you and all your friends are pulling down $30 million per year in wages. I'm a teacher, and I can you: I'm not.
62 posted on
08/23/2003 9:21:12 AM PDT by
summer
To: Quix
I appreciate your concern about "electability", but shouldn't policy count for something? OR do you just want to elect a donkey in elephant's clothes?
103 posted on
08/23/2003 9:31:47 AM PDT by
nwrep
To: Quix
>>>Arnolds comes across as being or having been 'one of us.'Arnold is big shot Hollywood type and so far, a political empty suit.
Vote McClintock!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson