[WOSG]

Me:"Indeed, if you tolerate others views, let Judge Moore do his thing and you do your thing."

You:"He can believe whatever he wants personally, but he cannot sanction a particular religious expression."

You are making an improper command out of your opinion.
That is not what the Constitution commands, nor any particular Federal of state law. Sanctioning an expression so far far far from establishment of religion.
Particular non-coercive religious expressions can be and should be part of the public life of this nation.

[gore3000]

Particular non-coercive religious expressions can be and should be part of the public life of this nation.

That's right, nowhere in the Constitution does it say anything about a right of freedom FROM religion which is what the atheists, the Alabama Court and apparently the atheist Supreme Court of the United States is pushing. Also, there is nothing in the Constitution about separation of Church and State. This they got from Thomas Jefferson who, although a great man, had nothing to do with the writing of the Constitution. Thus decisions made on it are totally unfounded in every way and an example of the pick an excuse from wherever you like to do what you want kind of rulings which the SC has been making for some 50 years.