Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: concerned about politics
For the same reason we yellow-bellied sap suckers are forced by law to support your ruby-throated hummingbird beliefs.

Which of my religious beliefs are you forced to support with your tax dollars? If you're receiving invoices for the tax bill for the church next door, you're either paying them willingly or somebody's handing you a line.

Why pay for land that supports only athiests when we're not athiests?

Is there "free land" out there that you don't have to pay for? Last time I checked, you had to go through a realtor to purchase land, and it isn't "free."

We'll keep the Moore courthouse, you can have the one in Hillarys neighborhood.

But, what happens if I'm forced to conduct business in the Moore courthouse? My tax dollars help pay for it as well. Why should it be incumbent upon me to worry about whether all the judges and officials also worship sapsuckers and therefore might not give me an even break.

The Founding Fathers were wise enough to try to keep personal religious beliefs out of official public life. And, this thread is a great example as to why.

745 posted on 08/22/2003 11:49:05 PM PDT by strela ("Each of us can find a maggot in our past which will happily devour our futures." Horatio Hornblower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]


To: strela
But, what happens if I'm forced to conduct business in the Moore courthouse? My tax dollars help pay for it as well.

What if I'm stranded in Hillaryville? I'd be forced to pay for yours! Fair is fair. If I pay, you pay. It's the American way.

752 posted on 08/22/2003 11:54:12 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies ]

To: strela
The Founding Fathers were wise enough to try to keep personal religious beliefs out of official public life. And, this thread is a great example as to why.

Nothing but thieves, whores, liars, and murderers on the supreme court? Really, I don't think that's quite the way they put it.
Indeed, the First Amendment reference was intended to protect the churches from interference by the state, not to protect a secular state from religion. It is about freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The modern extreme separationist notion was fabricated out of thin air by the liberal-dominated Supreme Court that unconstitutionally struck down school prayer in 1962.

755 posted on 08/22/2003 11:58:02 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifer lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson