Posted on 08/22/2003 3:54:30 AM PDT by kattracks
HEARING William D. Novelli lecture America’s senior citizens about what’s good for them is like attending a Martha Stewart speech on situational ethics.
The retired public relations executive and anti-tobacco crusader is part of a small coterie of liberal-left activists that have taken over the 35-million member American Association of Retired Persons — aka AARP — and are speeding it along the path to social activism.
Virtually all Americans with a mailing address get a sales pitch from AARP shortly before they turn 50. For $12.50 a year, it offers such “great benefits” as discounts on car rentals, lodging and cruises. Members also get a monthly magazine with articles about active, upbeat seniors and stuffed with ads about geriatric products.
In a recent op-ed in the conservative Washington Times, Novelli suggested — somewhat outlandishly — that AARP has a mandate from its 35 million members to represent their political wishes on Capitol Hill. Most card-carrying AARP members would be surprised to learn that the $12.50 they send to Washington each year for their AARP membership dues is apparently a tacit endorsement of AARP’s social activist agenda, and its lobbying campaign on behalf of an American welfare state.
Like roughly 80 percent of his members, Novelli is relatively well-heeled as he heads into his golden years. Perhaps he is even better off than most — he earns more than $600,000 a year in salary and fringes, and among those fringes is a generous employer-provided prescription drug benefit.
Nonetheless, AARP has been spending millions of dollars of its huge budget pushing to provide universal Medicare prescription drug benefits for all seniors. It’s equally amazing that a robustly free-market organization that peddles everything from insurance to polyester stretch pants is so opposed to giving seniors a real choice among private sector health care plans. After all, that’s what all federal employees already enjoy — and will continue to enjoy thanks to a special exemption by Congress.
Most of America’s 50 million senior citizens have lived independent lives — and they’re damn proud of it. They’ve worked their tails off, gone to war when necessary, provided for their children and stashed money away for their retirement years.
They’re also more compassionate than any other comparable group in human history. They volunteer hundreds of millions of hours each year helping others. They contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to charities. And they don’t mind paying taxes for government programs that actually help those who are temporarily down on their luck or who never got a fair shake in life.
But above that, they don’t want to stick their sons and daughters or their grandchildren with a spending tab that will make them indentured servants to the federal government for most of their working lives. Novelli never mentions the price tag of federal prescription drug reform to his membership, and the economic impact it will have on future generations.
Medicare already faces an imbalance exceeding $36 trillion — that’s trillion with a capital T, by the way. The Senate prescription drug bill, which AARP prefers, will add an unfunded liability of $12 trillion to that, according to a recent analysis by Jagadeesh Gokhale, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Kent Smetters, an assistant professor of insurance and risk management at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.
By 2020, Medicare’s current claims on income taxes — even without a new prescription drug benefit — will double to 14 percent from the current 7 percent. The proposed $400-billion drug benefit will boost that percentage to nearly 20 percent, which means a huge increase in marginal tax rates for middle-income Americans.
Few of AARP’s current 35.5 million members signed up to join a political organization dedicated to social change — especially social change that so overwhelmingly is not in the interest of most of them.
Ask any AARP card-carrying senior citizen what he likes best about the benefits of membership, and he will respond with a list of the discounts and other financial savings that the lobbying group offers. Not a one will say, “I love their attempts at social engineering!”
There’s probably no way to dissuade Novelli and the well-paid AARP hierarchy from pursuing their present course toward a nationalized health care system. That being said, it may well be time for AARP members who don’t want to go that route to simply jump off the train by sending back their membership cards.
If enough of them do, maybe we can avoid the coming train wreck. And America’s senior citizens can save their children and grandchildren from cleaning up the mess.
Jack Strayer is president of Jack Strayer & Associates, a consumer-oriented health care consulting firm. Readers may write him at 509 N. Patrick St., Alexandria, VA 22314.
Come to think of it, the AARP platform is not all that different from the Nazi platform.
Never had a chance to use it and find out. Done deal. Mailing the pieces back to AARP.
When I became 55 I joined AARP and later found them to be phony. Their mutual funds are poor choices, their hospitalization insurance a lousy bargain, their political agenda is un-American and their magazine is leftist propaganda.!
The money saved with their so-called discounts is non-existant. Hotels and motels give AAA a better discount than AARP.
The quicker senior Americans realize that the AARP is just nothing but a socialist-commie front, the better off the nation will be.
Goodbye AARP!
NOW they realize this? I thought people got this when they started including tracts from Karl MArx in their magazine.
Good work, JSP1. How did it feel to take that hideous piece of plastic and annihilate it?
Like voting. :-)
The lady couldn't understand my question. She finally said she would put me through to someone to answer my question. I got a recording on the other end.
These people can't think that far.
My mother has Alzheimer's, and is in a nursing home in California. For probably 20 years, she paid for AARP long-term care insurance - several hundred per month.
So when she needed it, we kids found that it only covered "reasonable" expenses, meaning about one-third of what it really cost. It didn't kick in until after six months in the home, then ran out after three years.
It was a bad deal. She would have been better off to invest the money she paid in premiums.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.