To: Gargantua
I had no idea that Moore's freedom of speech as an individual was constrained in any way. I thought this applied to his actions as a government official. Thank goodness the Bill of Rights constrains the actions of government officials. As a conservative, I wouldn't want it any other way.
7 posted on
08/21/2003 10:03:27 AM PDT by
Da Mav
To: Da Mav
Last I checked, Moore was neither "Congress" nor was Moore "making [a] law"...as the Constitution covers.
Please don't interperet the document I swore to defend to mean anything other than what it says.
17 posted on
08/21/2003 10:38:28 AM PDT by
ElectricStrawberry
(Anyone that would dare protest peace-weenies by themselves is a friend of mine)
To: Da Mav
"I had no idea that Moore's freedom of speech as an individual was constrained in any way." This thread makes no mention of Moore's individual right to freedom of speech. Only your misinterpretation of this thread does that. Learn to read, or think, or both. ;-/
29 posted on
08/21/2003 12:06:51 PM PDT by
Gargantua
(Embrace clarity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson