I'm not.
It was simple and to the point. It was good. It was one that provoked the question; Why?
The fact that you either don't really know why or decline to say why is odd. But hey, it's an odd site sometimes. People come here to read these articles and posts and comment on them. Most don't think they are being picked on when asked a sinple question about their post.
I'm not picking on you. Maybe someone else who thinks it was a pity will respond as to why they think so. I can't figure it out logically. It seems pretty clear to me that it's not a pity but a big part of the forum seems to think it is, so I just want to know,,,,,Why?
Im not refusing to answer you because I dont have a position in a logical sense. I am not answering because the debate has been discussed over and over and over. If you still dont see why its a pity based on this debate discussed, then you just dont read peoples posts with a similar position I hold.
You dont have to agree with me. But im sure you understand (not sympathize) the position of people who support Moore.
Again...the debate has been discussed, the positions have been laid out. My addition to the topic would be like adding sand to the beach.