Replies

"Outrage against tyranny is what the second amendment is all about. (to any liberals who may be lurking, no, it isn't about hunting)"

This is something the centrists and RINOs don't understand. Desperation leads to bloodshed. I really resent having to go through this all over again, being the dove, holding back the hawks. And I am concerned that I might fail this time. I was confident I could hold back the hawks during the Clinton regime. But not this time. The doves' credibility is shot. We failed to deliver on Clinton. Now, the hawks will be less willing to cool down. But I do not want to see the USA follow the same path of Rome. This is Marius and Sulla all over again, history repeating itself. And the centrists don't even have a clue that we are in anarchy and on the brink of something more ugly than they can comprehend.

The 2nd Amendment is for the final stand against tyranny, not prior to every other alternative. Moore has found a way to fight the leftist judicial tyranny without bullets, although he is adept with that alternative, himself, having been a West Point graduate in the 60s.

But this is the point I'm making. I just knew some trigger fingers would be itching over this. I can foresee a new rise in militias. And this time around, guys like me won't be believed as easilly when we say that we can handle all this peacefully. But while peaceful resistance sounds impotent after Clinton pulled off more crimes than even he can remember, this is not really the effective trigger for violence.

If violence erupts over this, it will be more fringe than when abortion clinics were bombed. Those few who do it will be very alone, and you would hear Keyes, Moore, Bush, Hannity, Rush, and Schwartzenegger all team up against the wrongdoer. While it would, in fact, be a war, it would be a war of a dozen extremists at best with the entire world.

We must not call for violence. It set us back terribly in OK City. And now, during a war against terror, it could be even worse.