Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
Those are two separate issues. Where the courts, federal or state, begin legislating from the bench we're all in agreement. That must stop.

The other issue is whether court orders must be obeyed. Saying no opens Pandora's Box. We don't want to go there.

549 posted on 08/20/2003 5:52:47 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
"The other issue is whether court orders must be obeyed. Saying no opens Pandora's Box. We don't want to go there."

Tyranny in a republic opens a pandora's box. Respecting tyranny is submission to it.
554 posted on 08/20/2003 5:54:58 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Don't confuse liberals with the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
The other issue is whether court orders must be obeyed

But there are even more issues here. It is the nature of a trial that each party contends the other has disobeyed orders. It's an old political question when the little guy is morally justified standing up to the big guy. Solzhenitsyn asked the question "when?" A pacifist say now, and like Gandhi, take it like sheep.

562 posted on 08/20/2003 6:00:34 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson