[Dog Gone]

He's going to lose, though. Everyone here might as well accept that.

Case law is too strong on the point, and this court is not going to do a major reversal of its previous holdings.

While the display doesn't bother me, and I think the current case law is too far in favor of ridiculous separation of church and state, there is one thing that really bothers me.

Judge Moore should not be defying a judicial order. If that is tolerated, the Rule of Law in this country means nothing. Nothing.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

"Judge Moore should not be defying a judicial order. If that is tolerated, the Rule of Law in this country means nothing. Nothing."

You almost get it. The Law is a joke. Moore didn't make it that way. The ACLU and the leftists made it that way. WE DO NOT RESPECT THE FEDERAL JUDGES? How many people must be arrested before you guys get it? We've had it with them!

[Havoc]

Judge Moore should not be defying a judicial order. If that is tolerated, the Rule of Law in this country means nothing. Nothing.

Bull. It does no damage to the rule of law - it merely highlights the limits of the legal system. Moore doing nothing would do a damage to our constitutional rights. And that cannot be.