Yes, it is - Southack is purposefully taking my statement out of context in an effort to argue against something that not only do I not contend, but is not consistent with the position I've taken all over this thread - which is that Ten Commandments displays in MOST instances, but not this one, are appropriate and completely legal. I have also frequently pointed to the 11th Circuit's allowance of the Richmond County, Georgia display two weeks before the Moore decision.
Southack wants to ignore that I was responding to this statement of yours: "because it is rare to encourage faith generically, the way our founding fathers did, and the way Judge Roy Moore is doing, following their footsteps" - and instead wants to take a snippet of my post and claim she is contradicting a position I am not even taking.
Ah ok. Well, God bless you. Please pray for these people going to jail. I realise you don't believe in their sincerity, but what if you're wrong? Both Moore and Keyes could have chosen much easier paths. FReegards....