Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend
Moore's defiance of the law is giving the left much ammunition about 'certain' judges being unable to uphold the law against their own personal beliefs.

This Judge needs to comply immediately and make a statement to the fact that he will uphold the law despite his personal feelings in the matter.

I agree completely. If the rule of law means anything at all, a sitting justice of a state Supreme Court must comply with an order from a federal court, regardless of what he thinks of the order. As I understand it, he is still free to appeal the order and, if he wins, he can move the monument back to its spot.

118 posted on 08/20/2003 1:50:54 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: kesg
"I agree completely. If the rule of law means anything at all, a sitting justice of a state Supreme Court must comply with an order from a federal court, regardless of what he thinks of the order."
\
1. Equal justice for All is required for the law to mean anything. God is put on our currency. What heads are rolling over that?

2. When the Courts ignore the Constitution, the law means nothing. We are in a state of oligarchial anarchy. This is proof of it.
125 posted on 08/20/2003 1:53:37 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Don't confuse liberals with the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson