Skip to comments.
ABC Reporter Suggests Bush To Blame For Bombing
ABC News
| 8/19/03
| Martha Raddatz
Posted on 08/20/2003 11:06:23 AM PDT by Gothmog
First, the pertinent excerpt:
ABC News' Raddatz reporting, "Last month, President Bush said the United States had the security situation under control, and enough forces to fight.
"'There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there,' the president said on July 2. 'My answer is "Bring 'em on." We got the force necessary to deal with the security situation.' But officials may now have to look at adding troops to the nearly 150,000 already there." (ABC News, Raddatz, 8/18/03)
Here's the rest of the article:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/unbombing030819.html
New Fears U.N. Bombing Raises Concern in Iraq: Are Separate Factions Joining Forces?
By Martha Raddatz
Aug. 19 The devastating bombing at the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad comes less than two weeks after a deadly attack on the Jordanian Embassy in Iraq. Investigators are working to determine who may be responsible for this violence, and what U.S. forces can do to stop them.
Today's truck bombing was the kind of attack that U.S. intelligence officials feared was coming bigger, bolder, aiming for mass casualties. The list of suspects is long.
"It's a complex mix of loyalists to Saddam; of Islamists who are Iraqi; of foreign volunteers; of Islamists with ties to al Qaeda," said ABCNEWS analyst Tony Cordesman, who holds the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Al Qaeda sympathizers are suspected in the Aug. 7 bombing of the Jordanian Embassy in Baghdad, which left 11 people dead. Militant Syrians, Saudis and Iranians are also thought to be infiltrating the country, seeking to destabilize Iraq and drive out the Americans.
"I am certain that there are lots of different players and they are not necessarily totally united," said retired Maj. Gen. Bill Nash, former commander of the Army's 1st Armored Division and now a consultant to ABCNEWS. "But they are united in their opposition to the United States."
The administration is hoping today's bombing will rally international support. But those who carried out the attack are certainly betting that it will scare the international community away.
Trying to Understand the Pattern
Today's bombing fits into a frightening pattern of escalating violence.
"We need to understand the pattern here," said Cordesman. "It has been building up, but it has been a mixture of violent acts of terrorism, of economic sabotage, a focused looting on critical facilities, oil export facilities, attacks on U.S. soldiers and the soldiers of other countries, attacks on friendly Iraqis, intimidation and threats. All of these measures have been brought together; it's not just one pattern."
The United States has aggressively gone after the opposition, as illustrated by today's arrest of former Iraqi Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan, No. 20 in the deck of cards depicting the 55 most-wanted members of the former regime.
But many fear that even if Saddam Hussein is captured, the violence will not end.
"We also know that even though we talk about this decks of cards, [55] top people, there are literally tens and thousands of people in this structure," said Cordesman.
More Troops Needed?
Last month, President Bush said the United States had the security situation under control, and enough forces to fight.
"There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there," the president said on July 2. "My answer is 'Bring 'em on.' We got the force necessary to deal with the security situation." But officials may now have to look at adding troops to the nearly 150,000 already there.
"We need to seriously consider the additional forces coming from the United States initially, but I think we also need to make the point that today's attack was an attack on the international community," said Nash.
"This was the headquarters of the United Nations, the very agency that is intended to make a better life for the Iraqi people, unquestioned by all", he said. "Therefore, I think we need to make the case to our allies and the international community at large that they are in the fight now, too."
Thus far, the United States has had little success in getting any significant number of troops from countries besides Britain to join the fight. The administration is hoping today's bombing will rally international support. But those who carried out the attack are certainly betting that it will scare the international community away.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abc; abcdisney; abcnews; agitprop; antiamerican; blameamericafirst; boycott; boycottdisney; bringemon; bushbashing; clymer; disney; dnctalkingpoints; flypaperstrategy; hateamericafirst; iraqaftermath; iraqiterrorists; lovedclintonswars; martharaddatz; mediabias; nateringnabobs; negativity; propaganda; saddamhandmaidens; sedition; terrorism; terrorists; unamerican; unhqbombing; waltsspinningcorpse; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Gothmog
She also blamed the power outage on him last week, said that FirstEnergy made big contributions to the Republicans.
Only heard her report it once, however.
21
posted on
08/20/2003 11:36:46 AM PDT
by
mombonn
(¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
To: Gothmog
U.N. officials at the headquarters refused heavy security because the United Nations ``did not want a large American presence outside,'' said Salim Lone, the U.N. spokesman in Baghdad. AP today
22
posted on
08/20/2003 11:37:05 AM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(WOD Resistance Tip # 2 - Plant Your Seeds)
To: My2Cents
US occupation of Iraq is bringing Saudis and other Islamonutters out of the surrounding swamps [Syria/Iran] It's one good way to kill mosquitos--swat them when they land on you.
A better way is to go into the swamp and spray it.
23
posted on
08/20/2003 11:38:22 AM PDT
by
henbane
To: My2Cents
I agree with you, and I think, in conjunction w/ the Israeli homicide attack, public opinion is going to shift toward the 'screw the terrorists' side.
But, Raddatz has a nationwide TV audience, Steyn does not. Her little hit is going to have a larger effect and I predict the leftists will soon seize on her idea and repeat it -- giving it a much wider impact.
Of course, her charge has no merit. She might as well blame 9/11 on 'minorities worldwide feeling disaffected by the 2000 election.'
The terrorists were going to strike, and have been for months, whether Bush said 'bring it on' or not. But she leaves her audience with a much different opinion.
24
posted on
08/20/2003 11:39:39 AM PDT
by
Gothmog
To: Roughneck
That's why I don't watch ABC (Always Bull Sh**!)
To: From The Deer Stand
Correction: Always Bull Crap! I got carried away...........
To: Gothmog
Therein is the problem....the typical ABC reporter may reach more people than Mark Steyn. But I thought it was interesting that last night, Britt Hume mentioned the "flypaper" strategy of attracting the Islamofascists to Iraq to take our our military, as opposed to having them concentrate on US soil. So, the theory is out there. And if this is indeed what the Administration's aim is, we'll be hearing more about it in the future to refute the babblings of ABC reporters. (One would hope.)
27
posted on
08/20/2003 11:42:10 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: Gothmog
Good propaganda and good headline fodder both make for terrible policy. I hope that people will tune this ignorant blather out.
28
posted on
08/20/2003 11:45:29 AM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
(The Problem With Socialism Is That You Eventually Run Out Of Other People's Money - Lady Thatcher)
To: Gothmog
BOYCOTT DISNEY: a vortex of seductive evil
29
posted on
08/20/2003 11:46:34 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Roughneck
What a concept ! Blame him for everything.
To: Gothmog
"Except for the recently built concrete wall, U.N. officials at the headquarters refused heavy security because the United Nations ``did not want a large American presence outside,'' said Salim Lone, the U.N. spokesman in Baghdad." UN Officials Deliberately REFUSED U.S. Security in Baghdad "did not want American presence"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/967348/posts
31
posted on
08/20/2003 12:00:22 PM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: Gothmog
"The people in the U.N. building are civilians; they do not belong to armed forces or any parties to the conflict," said Wilder Tayler, the legal adviser to Human Rights Watch. "Under the terms of international humanitarian law, there is a basic rule, the principle of distinction ... between civilians and combatants. When you target directly civilians, intentionally, that is a war crime."I don't remember this little puke chiming in when Israeli buses and buildings blow up.
32
posted on
08/20/2003 12:01:40 PM PDT
by
FlyVet
To: Gothmog
Yup, Martha is a vile lefty.
And ugly too . . .
33
posted on
08/20/2003 12:09:58 PM PDT
by
Petruchio
(<===Looks Sexy in a flightsuit . . . Looks Silly in a french maid outfit)
To: Gothmog
From the article~~~
"But officials may now have to look at adding troops to the nearly 150,000 already there." (ABC News, Raddatz, 8/18/03) Why? Do UN personnel now want to be seen in the company of American soldiers?
To: Right_in_Virginia
UN personnel would be wise to be seen BEHIND American soldiers.
35
posted on
08/20/2003 12:54:02 PM PDT
by
Sender
To: Gothmog
Well .. it's going to be short-lived because FOX is all over the place saying that WE offered the UN more security and THEY TURNED IT DOWN - saying they did not want a USA presence there. Now, Kofi Annan has come out saying that if the UN did that, it was the wrong decision.
Also .. Rush was saying the same thing today. The issue is dead and ABC is wasting their breath.
36
posted on
08/20/2003 1:09:39 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
To: Gothmog
Oh, brother.
37
posted on
08/20/2003 1:10:38 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Gothmog
This is irresponsible reporting.
To: areafiftyone
***How quickly they forget the 90's terrorist acts when they had their pockets lined with money from the dot com bubble!***
Greed, Selfishness, Pettiness. . .a few things democrat-socialists dont leave home without!
39
posted on
08/20/2003 1:44:42 PM PDT
by
Roughneck
(Starve the Beast!)
To: reed_inthe_wind
And what kind of name is "Raddatz" anyway? Sounds like some foreign-born jag-off!
40
posted on
08/20/2003 1:46:53 PM PDT
by
Roughneck
(Starve the Beast!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson