Skip to comments.
Your Tax Dollars At Work ... for Anti-Alcohol Activists
Consumer Freedom ^
Posted on 08/20/2003 8:01:44 AM PDT by Stew Padasso
Your Tax Dollars At Work ... for Anti-Alcohol Activists
Posted On August 19, 2003
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) will soon release a major report on how to prevent underage drinking. Americans deserve a serious, science-based examination of this important topic, but the NAS report will almost certainly be a piece of anti-alcohol propaganda. It is expected to call for increased taxes on adult beverages and stricter regulations on marketing and advertising. Those recommendations target adult consumers, not just underage drinkers. Which is precisely the point.
Nine of the 12 "experts" chosen to sit on the NAS panel are associated with -- if not self-proclaimed -- anti-alcohol activists. Eight of the twelve have ties to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), an $8 billion alcohol opponent. Seven have endorsed increased taxes or restrictions on adult beverages.
The panelists include:
Marilyn Aguirre-Molina, a former RWJF Senior Program Officer (and now a RWJF consultant) who accused alcohol companies in 1990 of "killing us softly" and proclaims that "they steal our heroes, holidays, and values in order to sell booze." While at RWJF, Aguirre-Molina co-founded the National Latino Council on Alcohol and Tobacco Prevention (LCAT), an organization that proclaims that "problems can even result from moderate drinking." In 1992 she created a video titled "Marketing Disease to Hispanics: The Selling of Alcohol and Tobacco." At the RWJF-funded Alcohol Policy Conference XIII, she was on a panel entitled "Preventing alcohol problems: Popular approaches are ineffective, effective approaches are politically impossible."
Philip Cook, a "sin tax" advocate who recently won the RWJF Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research (which includes up to $275,000 in grants) for study on "The Health and Social Consequences of Alcohol Taxation and Control." This followed his 2002 report, in which he concluded that "current [alcohol] excise taxes are too low, both nationally and in every state. The rates are far less than the average social cost of each drink consumed. Raising the excise tax would be in the public interest."
Judy Cushing, CEO of the RWJF-funded Oregon Partnership, which has run public advertisements linking beer with heroin and other illegal drugs. Cushing is currently lobbying to increase Oregon's excise tax on beer.
Mark Moore, author of a New York Times editorial titled: "Actually, Prohibition Was a Success." Moore argued that the criminalization of alcohol was effective in reducing alcohol-related problems.
Richard J. Bonnie, the NAS panel chair, who was previously the chair of a RWJF-funded Committee on Injury Prevention and Control. Bonnie gave a presentation to a RWJF-funded "Conference on the Historical and Cultural Aspects of Substance Abuse." He has also represented "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski, and advocates the legalization of marijuana.
Denise Herd, recipient of RWJF's "Innovators Combating Substance Abuse" award for 2000, which carried a $300,000 cash prize. Herd reviewed a report on alcohol marketing from the RWJF-founded Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth.
Joel Grube, director of the Prevention Research Center at the anti-alcohol, RWJF-funded Pacific Institute on Research & Evaluation (PIRE). Grube has authored a PIRE study funded by RWJF, and was a panelist at the RWJF-funded Alcohol Policy Conference XIII.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alcohol; beer; powertotax; prohibition; taxdollarsatwork; taxes; temperance; underagedrinking; wodlist; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Number of resource links from the original source.
To: Stew Padasso
Government waste, sheesh.
2
posted on
08/20/2003 8:04:56 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Stew Padasso
Nice work/good find here. Though can I suggest a different title:
"A Who's Who of Health Nazis"
3
posted on
08/20/2003 8:05:24 AM PDT
by
JohnGalt
("the constitution as it is, the union as it was")
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
4
posted on
08/20/2003 8:07:52 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
To: cinFLA
RWJF Ping
5
posted on
08/20/2003 8:08:18 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
To: Stew Padasso; Phantom Lord
6
posted on
08/20/2003 8:12:29 AM PDT
by
Constitution Day
(Bear with me, I'm still looking at all my pings.)
To: Constitution Day
Man, I'd choose the liquor!
7
posted on
08/20/2003 8:14:44 AM PDT
by
Ken H
To: Constitution Day
Well, it's a worthy sentiment, but judging from the photo, I doubt they had many takers anyway. Yikes!
8
posted on
08/20/2003 8:15:14 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Constitution Day
LOL! No problem. You ladies just go ahead and keep your lips to yourselves. Snicker :-)
To: Constitution Day
There is no amount of alcohol to make those ladies approachable.
10
posted on
08/20/2003 8:18:52 AM PDT
by
Stew Padasso
(pro-rock.com - bsnn.net - libertyteeth.com - BFD - Puff Puff Ping)
To: Stew Padasso
Moore argued that the criminalization of alcohol was effective in reducing alcohol-related problems. Here is one of your prime examples of "it's a matter of definitions".
On the basis that alcohol consumption and bar brawls may have gone down... Prohibition was a success. But only if you overlook Al Capone's gangland masacres, corruption, death and sickness from bathtub gin, and bribery.
11
posted on
08/20/2003 8:19:25 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Stew Padasso
If anything, you would think it's women who look like that who would be encouraging as much drinking as possible. Forget the beer goggles, those women need PGA goggles.
12
posted on
08/20/2003 8:21:25 AM PDT
by
tdadams
To: Stew Padasso
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), an $8 billion alcohol opponentIf you liked the War on Drugs, you are gonna LOVE the War on Booze.
13
posted on
08/20/2003 8:23:52 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I'm pretending I'm pulling in a TROUT! Am I doing it correctly?)
To: tdadams
absolutely Prohibition was a success,
look what it got us the Kennedy's,organized crime,
police corruption, disease, sickness and death from bad booze
Politicians on the take, a gov't sink hole for our tax dollars
sounds just like our current prohibition, war on drugs.
kinda makes you go, hmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!
14
posted on
08/20/2003 8:25:51 AM PDT
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
To: Stew Padasso
So whats the big deal? This is how the anti-smoking league/lobby got started, no one minded then.
Smokers have been taxed, over-taxed, and taxed again, and then demonized (in the name of the "widdle childwen)...it's about time the government started pickin' on the alcohaulics as well!
I mean, surely everyone who drinks is an alcoholic right? Everyone who drinks causes accidents right? Kind of like every smoker kills children with second hand smoke, right?
Pure sarcasm, yes. BUT I still get a kick out of watching others see how it feels . . .
15
posted on
08/20/2003 8:26:27 AM PDT
by
Roughneck
(Starve the Beast!)
To: Stew Padasso
Americans haven't had a "serious, science-based examination" of ANY topic since before I was born.
16
posted on
08/20/2003 8:27:45 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: tdadams
17
posted on
08/20/2003 8:27:46 AM PDT
by
Stew Padasso
(pro-rock.com - bsnn.net - libertyteeth.com - BFD - Puff Puff Ping)
To: Stew Padasso
18
posted on
08/20/2003 8:30:24 AM PDT
by
Stew Padasso
(pro-rock.com - bsnn.net - libertyteeth.com - BFD - Puff Puff Ping)
To: Stew Padasso
Personally, I'm trying a new fangled approach to keeping my teen from drinking. I call it parenting.
19
posted on
08/20/2003 8:35:17 AM PDT
by
sweet_diane
(Philippians 4:12-13)
To: Constitution Day
I'd say that is would take a WHOLE Bunch of liquor before anyone would consider touching their lips to those shrews.
20
posted on
08/20/2003 8:35:51 AM PDT
by
Malsua
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson