Skip to comments.
How 12 Editorial Cartoonists View the CA Gov Candidate,
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Cagle's Cartoon Index ^
| August 2003
| Various Cartoonists
Posted on 08/19/2003 9:53:06 PM PDT by summer
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/cagle067890.gif)
(1) Daryl Cagle, Slate.com
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/walthandelsman.gif)
(2) Walt Handelsman, Long Island, NY, Newsday
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/sack.gif)
(3) Steve Sack, Minnesota, The Minneapolis Star-Tribune
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/margulies2.gif)
(4) Jimmy Margulies, New Jersey -- The Record
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/cole.jpg)
(5) John Cole, Durham, NC -- The Herald-Sun
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/summers.gif)
(6) Dana Summers, Orlando, FL,
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/schorr.gif)
(7) Bill Schorr, United Media
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/1/stahler54.gif)
(8) Jeff Stahler, The Cincinnati Post, Ohio
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/schorr.gif)
(9) Bill Schorr, United Media
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/matson.gif)
(10) R.J. Matson, NY, The New York Observer
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/keefe.gif)
(11) Mike Keefe, The Denver Post
![](http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/Schwarzenegger/Schwarzeneggergifs/cole.jpg)
(12) John Cole, Durham, NC -- The Herald-Sun
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; ca; calgov2002; california; cartoon; cartoons; comic; comics; editorialcartoon; editorialcartoonist; editorialcartoonists; editorialcartoons; govrace; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-200 next last
To: Carry_Okie
But luckily some of us know the difference between what he said and what the media wants us to think he said.
81
posted on
08/20/2003 2:52:32 PM PDT
by
byteback
To: Tempest
...replace one idotic Democrat, with an even bigger idiotic Democrat
I believe you're making a valid point there. But that's why I also believe Arnold will split the Dem vote, because some Dem voters may already see Cruz as part of the "loser" team. That's why I think those Dems will vote for Arnold.
82
posted on
08/20/2003 4:03:08 PM PDT
by
summer
To: doodlelady
Re your post #77 - LOL...that post really made my day. Thank YOU, doodlelady. :)!
83
posted on
08/20/2003 4:04:01 PM PDT
by
summer
To: BibChr
McClintock is like the experienced captain who CANNOT WIN a FIFTY-DAY campaign.
Dan, Thanks for your reply.
As to the above excerpt from your post, no, that is not at all what I am saying. McClintock is already a senator. Clearly he already won some elections, but, outside of his district, he may not be so well know. I think that is a rasonable observation. You are taking to an extreme that makes no sense. We don't know if he can win. But he certainly won't win if he doesn't increase his name recognition. I think 50-50 is about where his chances now, as it could go either way, depending on what happens next.
84
posted on
08/20/2003 4:10:44 PM PDT
by
summer
To: BibChr
Re your post #79 -- Next, I don't think you did get part of the point of my essay. Schwarzenegger has what he needs to start, which is name recognition
No, I disagree again. I think what happened is that you missed the point of all these editorial cartoons I posted. These people, from all around the country, who can NOT be labled "right wing wackos," as Davis might say, are making the point that beyond the name recognition Arnold has, what is there? And, that is a question you did not answer in your essay. I answered in my reply to you. What he has is not related to the job he is seeking, as far as I can tell.
In short, Arnold wants to be the captain of the team, but so far, he has only been on the field for the purpose of providing half-time entertainment. Yet, you say he is now ready to lead the team to victory in the Super Bowl no less. With all due respect you, I sincerely disagree. But, time will tell which of us is correct on that point.
85
posted on
08/20/2003 4:14:09 PM PDT
by
summer
To: BibChr
Doesn't he also have a Masters in some business area?
No, he only has a bachelor's degree. I believe its in business. But, that is OK with me.
86
posted on
08/20/2003 4:15:55 PM PDT
by
summer
To: BibChr
He has actually succeeded at several careers; he has showed great focus and self-discipline. In this, he has it over may "professional" and "experienced" politicians who never had real jobs
Yes, I will agree with that about Arnold.
Now, consider this: I, too, have succeeded at several careers. And, I too have great focus and self-discipline. BTW -- I also earned my Masters.
Consequently, if I was a resident of CA, would I be more qualified than he is to now be CA governor?
According to your reply, the answer seems to be: yes.
87
posted on
08/20/2003 4:18:53 PM PDT
by
summer
To: summer
I don't think they're funny at all.
88
posted on
08/20/2003 4:18:55 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Carry_Okie
You're right. It's because he's dumb enough to make himself an easy target. I suppose you would say the same of Bush, huh?
89
posted on
08/20/2003 4:23:06 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: BibChr
Rob Lowe is not an advisor, as you take it...YOu have a problem with that?
That's the word I have heard and see reported with respect to Rob Lowe. You are the only one who has a new and different definition for what he is to Arnold.
And, yes, I have a problem with men who have sex with underage girls. Because often those underage girls get pregnant, and when that happens, that is often the end of those girls' education. I know that is not the concern of guys like Rob Lowe, but if I was running for gov of CA, I would politely ask Rob Lowe and others like him to stay as far away from my campaign as possible.
90
posted on
08/20/2003 4:23:06 PM PDT
by
summer
To: Saundra Duffy
Check out post #12. Maybe you'll like those.
91
posted on
08/20/2003 4:23:34 PM PDT
by
summer
To: summer
I have no belief whatsoever that he currently has the skills, talents and intellectual capacity required to govern the state of CA.Then you missed today's press conference.
92
posted on
08/20/2003 4:23:57 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
I'm waiting to see it. So far the press is saying he didn't really say anything. Again. He didn't say what programs he would cut. He copied what Simon is saying: "First, CA needs an audit." So, what did you see that was new and difference and specific?
93
posted on
08/20/2003 4:25:46 PM PDT
by
summer
To: summer
It is too big a job for someone with no experience whatsoever in government.Then you favor keeping Davis or Bustamante?
94
posted on
08/20/2003 4:26:04 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
I think my post #1 made it crystal clear who I favor at this point -- though I am not a CA voter, so it doesn't really matter.
95
posted on
08/20/2003 4:27:11 PM PDT
by
summer
To: BibChr
His picture is not as piutch black as you paint it.
Dan, actually, I think I was quite kind and generous in my portrayal of Arnold-the-CA-Gov-Candidate. After all, I did not post the following cartoon, from reply #12, which some may find is far more pointed than anything I wrote about Arnold:
96
posted on
08/20/2003 4:31:23 PM PDT
by
summer
To: summer
So far the press is saying he didn't really say anything.Don't you realize that the press is biased for Bustamante and against S? They want the republican vote away from S and split to get Bustamante in.
97
posted on
08/20/2003 4:34:26 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: BibChr
Dan, I leave you with this thought, below, because I enjoyed chatting with you -- and, I still think McClintock could win this recall:
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
98
posted on
08/20/2003 4:35:44 PM PDT
by
summer
To: cinFLA
See my post #98.
99
posted on
08/20/2003 4:36:03 PM PDT
by
summer
To: BibChr
Re my post #84 - rasonable = rational
100
posted on
08/20/2003 4:38:11 PM PDT
by
summer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-200 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson