[quidnunc]

Holdonnow wrote: Yes, and Reagan criticized Ford, even ran against him. I suppose you would have accused Reagan of ruining the GOP too. Rush is intellectually honest, as was Reagan. These are good qualities my friend, unworthy of your assault.

If I'm assaulting anything it's Rush's judgement and his intellectual honesty.

He used to understand that you don't get anything for coming in second in an election.

He used to understand that all things being equal any Republican office-holder was better than having a Democrat.

Well he's either forgotten or he's trying to be Michael Savage lite.

I'm betting on the latter.

[Reagan Man]

You're lost on the outer limits of the twilight zone.

As Kevin Curry said:

>>>As a Republican, Schwarzenegger fails to meet even that most modest standard of "good enough."

Arnold is not a conservative. Arnold is a liberal RINO.

[Captainpaintball]

Well he's either forgotten or he's trying to be Michael Savage lite.

So you are saying the number 1 rated personality in radio is trying to become the number 3 rated personality in radio? That doesn't go with your "in it for the money/ratings" scenario.

...any Republican office-holder was better than having a Democrat.

If this type of Republican strategery catches on, we will have a party FULL of saboteurs like jim jeffords, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, etc.

[CyberAnt]

Oh, so Wilson was better because he had an "R" behind his name - all the while stabbing all the conservatives and the rest of the state in the back with the largest tax increase in history.

That alone makes your statement totally STUPID!!!