Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Newman Is Still HUD
The New York Times ^ | 08/19/03 | PAUL NEWMAN

Posted on 08/18/2003 8:49:57 PM PDT by Pokey78

he Fox News Network is suing Al Franken, the political satirist, for using the phrase "fair and balanced" in the title of his new book. In claiming trademark violation, Fox sets a noble example for standing firm against whatever.

Unreliable sources report that the Fox suit has inspired Paul Newman, the actor, to file a similar suit in federal court against the Department of Housing and Urban Development, commonly called HUD. Mr. Newman claims piracy of personality and copycat infringement.

In the 1963 film "HUD," for which Mr. Newman was nominated for an Academy Award, the ad campaign was based on the slogan, "Paul Newman is HUD." Mr. Newman claims that the Department of Housing and Urban Development, called HUD, is a fair and balanced institution and that some of its decency and respectability has unfairly rubbed off on his movie character, diluting the rotten, self-important, free-trade, corrupt conservative image that Mr. Newman worked so hard to project in the film. His suit claims that this "innocence by association" has hurt his feelings plus residuals.

A coalition of the willing — i.e., the Bratwurst Asphalt Company and the Ypsilanti Hot Dog and Bean Shop — has been pushed forward and is prepared to label its products "fair and balanced," knowing that Fox News will sue and that its newscasters will be so tied up with subpoenas they will only be able to broadcast from the courtroom, where they will be seen tearing their hair and whining, looking anything but fair and balanced, which would certainly be jolly good sport all around.

Paul Newman, an actor, is chief executive of Salad King.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; trademark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2003 8:49:57 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
More like, DUD.
2 posted on 08/18/2003 8:53:02 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
DUH.......
3 posted on 08/18/2003 8:54:01 PM PDT by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Damn! Where do you find comedy like that but in the NYT?

Paul Newman- another celebrity eager to demean himself instead of quietly going off with dignity.
4 posted on 08/18/2003 8:54:17 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
You know, it's really Spike Lee who started all this. As one writer put it, Somewhere Nick Nolte is kicking himself that he didn't sue Nick at Night before the statute of limitations ran out.
5 posted on 08/18/2003 8:55:22 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
but when is the New York Times going to admit it's just a latterday attempt to revitalize the National Lampoon?
6 posted on 08/18/2003 9:02:25 PM PDT by ahadams2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But is he doing this with "Absence of Malice"?...I'll find out...I'll call my friend Sally Fields.

FMCDH

7 posted on 08/18/2003 9:07:43 PM PDT by nothingnew (I've changed my tagline and will tell no one what it is until I'm on the Jay Leno show!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
What came first? Hud the Gov. or Hud the movie. If the Gov.agency existed first, they should be able to sue Paul Newman.
9 posted on 08/18/2003 9:09:39 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Paul, what we have here is, a failure to communicate.

Newman's sniffing too much of his ragout.

10 posted on 08/18/2003 9:12:27 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

New York Times sues The Onion for copyright infringement

or is it the other way around?
11 posted on 08/18/2003 9:12:45 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
The movie came first in 63. LBJ gave us HUD.

Hey, I think he got a point on this one.
I think Fox was silly to sue.
12 posted on 08/18/2003 9:14:35 PM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
MY parents shoulda sued. ;)
13 posted on 08/18/2003 9:14:41 PM PDT by BradyLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AR15_Patriot
HUD...HUD...Oh yeah, they're the ones who won't help me buy a house because I'm white

They're also the ones left with missing millions after Cuomo Jr.'s tenure.

14 posted on 08/18/2003 9:14:59 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
How come these people didn't pipe up when Spike Lee sued viacom. This isn't even clever.
15 posted on 08/18/2003 9:15:11 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
I'm going to say this again...if somebody wrote a book, put my picture and the name of my store on the cover and the words CROOK appeared in big bold letters I'd sue too. I believe what he is saying is malicious slander.
16 posted on 08/18/2003 9:16:42 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
Our next door neighbor in Amarillo back then was a local TV personality named Warren Anderson. In the opening scenes of HUD, you might recall a barkeeper sweeping glass up from his sidewalk. Someone asks him what happened last night. He says, "I had Hud last night!" That bartender was our neighbor.
17 posted on 08/18/2003 9:18:44 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Unreliable sources report . . .

Confirmation that this is indeed a Times article . . .

18 posted on 08/18/2003 9:24:28 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
I dont know if it is true or not but on another thread today I read that if Fox didnt challenge this, they would lose the rights to "fair and balanced".
19 posted on 08/18/2003 9:25:10 PM PDT by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
If using the generic term "fair and balanced" is deemed a copyright infringement by any court in this land, I will stop eating meat. This is a really stupid suit by Fox. Fox takes itself too seriously, and it should be slapped down, and will be.
20 posted on 08/18/2003 9:42:58 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson