Skip to comments.
Paul Newman Is Still HUD
The New York Times ^
| 08/19/03
| PAUL NEWMAN
Posted on 08/18/2003 8:49:57 PM PDT by Pokey78
he Fox News Network is suing Al Franken, the political satirist, for using the phrase "fair and balanced" in the title of his new book. In claiming trademark violation, Fox sets a noble example for standing firm against whatever.
Unreliable sources report that the Fox suit has inspired Paul Newman, the actor, to file a similar suit in federal court against the Department of Housing and Urban Development, commonly called HUD. Mr. Newman claims piracy of personality and copycat infringement.
In the 1963 film "HUD," for which Mr. Newman was nominated for an Academy Award, the ad campaign was based on the slogan, "Paul Newman is HUD." Mr. Newman claims that the Department of Housing and Urban Development, called HUD, is a fair and balanced institution and that some of its decency and respectability has unfairly rubbed off on his movie character, diluting the rotten, self-important, free-trade, corrupt conservative image that Mr. Newman worked so hard to project in the film. His suit claims that this "innocence by association" has hurt his feelings plus residuals.
A coalition of the willing i.e., the Bratwurst Asphalt Company and the Ypsilanti Hot Dog and Bean Shop has been pushed forward and is prepared to label its products "fair and balanced," knowing that Fox News will sue and that its newscasters will be so tied up with subpoenas they will only be able to broadcast from the courtroom, where they will be seen tearing their hair and whining, looking anything but fair and balanced, which would certainly be jolly good sport all around.
Paul Newman, an actor, is chief executive of Salad King.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; trademark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
1
posted on
08/18/2003 8:49:57 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
More like, DUD.
2
posted on
08/18/2003 8:53:02 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: Pokey78
DUH.......
To: Pokey78
Damn! Where do you find comedy like that but in the NYT?
Paul Newman- another celebrity eager to demean himself instead of quietly going off with dignity.
4
posted on
08/18/2003 8:54:17 PM PDT
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: Pokey78
You know, it's really Spike Lee who started all this. As one writer put it, Somewhere Nick Nolte is kicking himself that he didn't sue Nick at Night before the statute of limitations ran out.
5
posted on
08/18/2003 8:55:22 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: Pokey78
but when is the New York Times going to admit it's just a latterday attempt to revitalize the National Lampoon?
6
posted on
08/18/2003 9:02:25 PM PDT
by
ahadams2
To: Pokey78
But is he doing this with "Absence of Malice"?...I'll find out...I'll call my friend Sally Fields.
FMCDH
7
posted on
08/18/2003 9:07:43 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I've changed my tagline and will tell no one what it is until I'm on the Jay Leno show!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
What came first? Hud the Gov. or Hud the movie. If the Gov.agency existed first, they should be able to sue Paul Newman.
9
posted on
08/18/2003 9:09:39 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
To: Pokey78
Paul, what we have here is, a failure to communicate.
Newman's sniffing too much of his ragout.
10
posted on
08/18/2003 9:12:27 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: Pokey78
New York Times sues The Onion for copyright infringement
or is it the other way around?
11
posted on
08/18/2003 9:12:45 PM PDT
by
WOSG
To: fish hawk
The movie came first in 63. LBJ gave us HUD.
Hey, I think he got a point on this one.
I think Fox was silly to sue.
To: jocon307
MY parents shoulda sued. ;)
13
posted on
08/18/2003 9:14:41 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
To: AR15_Patriot
HUD...HUD...Oh yeah, they're the ones who won't help me buy a house because I'm whiteThey're also the ones left with missing millions after Cuomo Jr.'s tenure.
To: Pokey78
How come these people didn't pipe up when Spike Lee sued viacom. This isn't even clever.
15
posted on
08/18/2003 9:15:11 PM PDT
by
Hildy
To: Princeliberty
I'm going to say this again...if somebody wrote a book, put my picture and the name of my store on the cover and the words CROOK appeared in big bold letters I'd sue too. I believe what he is saying is malicious slander.
16
posted on
08/18/2003 9:16:42 PM PDT
by
Hildy
To: thegreatbeast
Our next door neighbor in Amarillo back then was a local TV personality named Warren Anderson. In the opening scenes of HUD, you might recall a barkeeper sweeping glass up from his sidewalk. Someone asks him what happened last night. He says, "I had Hud last night!" That bartender was our neighbor.
17
posted on
08/18/2003 9:18:44 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: Pokey78
Unreliable sources report . . . Confirmation that this is indeed a Times article . . .
18
posted on
08/18/2003 9:24:28 PM PDT
by
BraveMan
To: Princeliberty
I dont know if it is true or not but on another thread today I read that if Fox didnt challenge this, they would lose the rights to "fair and balanced".
To: Pokey78
If using the generic term "fair and balanced" is deemed a copyright infringement by any court in this land, I will stop eating meat. This is a really stupid suit by Fox. Fox takes itself too seriously, and it should be slapped down, and will be.
20
posted on
08/18/2003 9:42:58 PM PDT
by
Torie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson