Hitler and Hillary

Worldnetdaily ^ | 08/18/03 | Vox Day

[Gritty]

If you start reading this article half way down, you would think the political planks were written by Hillay herself!

[FastCoyote]

Great article.

[norraad]

We need that "I love country music" bumper sticker posted here, please.

[Free ThinkerNY]

[T'wit]

>> which has an absence of classes

All the communist "leaders" and their retinues led and still lead opulent lives, with rich housing and multitudes of servants and special stores and dachas. Fidel even now is worth upwards of $100 million. Look at Saddam's palaces all over Iraq. What are these university idiots thinking????

Throughout all known history. the state has always been an instrument for one class to exploit another. Totalitarian state = total exploitation. Marx himself knew this. He preached that the state would wither away, and all the little socialists understood and nodded their heads. Of course it is total fantasy to vest all power in the state and then expect the state to wither away, but true believers never learn. Marx was one more academic idiot.

End of lesson. Grow up, ye stupid professors.

[Blood of Tyrants]

At work there is a rabid clintoon lover and Bush hater who dared to compare the right wing with the Nazis (interesting since his father was a US citizen born in Czechslovokia and his mother was German). I then made him tell me what "Nazi" was short for and he correctly said "National Socialist German Worker's Party". At that point I swooped in and pointed out that ALL socialist parties are LEFT WING parties like the DemocRats.

He doesn't compare the right to the Nazis anymore. Except to his buddies on DU.

[Eva]

It is not true that the socialist workers party moved away from from the industrialists and became conservative, they moved closer to the industrialists and became fascists.

Fascism is actually a more apt description of the Progressive Democrats, of which Hillary is a member. Fascism is a kind of quid pro quo relationship between industry and the state, where the state passes regulations which benefit industry supporters of their agenda. We see this today in some of the energy companies who support environmental regulations which increase the cost to consumers, and industry profits at the same time.

[biblewonk]

7. We demand that the State shall make it its first duty to promote the industry and livelihood of the citizens of the State.

As if that's not the job of any government.

[mrtysmm]

Too skinny.....much, much too skinny!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[steplock]

This is NOT belittling your post, but I have an observation...

I have never seen two definitions of FASCISM that are the same. Your definition DOES describe what is happening in this country though with the insurance-healthcare-"Legislative Branch" ; energy-bank-"Executive Branch" ; and other interesting mutual back-scratching links.

Is there an TRUE definition of Fascism?

I had always thought that it meant a strong nationalistic sentiment with protectionist laws and regs - I never saw anything wrong with that since it is the principal this country had been operating on until recently - and it is the reason the USA is the most advanced in the world (but falling fast since we lost the principles)

[bc2]

govt's job is to protect natural rights, not to promote industry.

[biblewonk]

govt's job is to protect natural rights, not to promote industry.

Not true. Native american government cared nothing about promoting industry, what happened to those governments?

[sweetliberty]

Here's another good article along the same lines:

How Nazis are like the *Radical* Left Wing

BTW, I like the tornado elephant on your profile page. Hope you don't mind if I "borrowed" it.

[Soliv123]

Bedolido, Your imformation is very valuable. Thanks for the input. Your truthfullness is helping everyone to keep the world free.

[sweetliberty]

[RightWingConspirator]

Perhaps one reason so many members of old-wealth families, such as the Kennedys, the Rockefellers, the Goulds, ect. are Democrats--they want to use the power of government to preserve their fortunes and the status quo. They simply do not want to see wealth accumulation by any of us rabble.

[RightWingConspirator]

I am a little dense today--please decode.

[norraad]

Thank yew!

[sweetliberty]

Perhaps you could respond to post #18.