Arnold is a RINO, and by no means guaranteed to win this battle for CA governor. Conservative Republican's should seriously look at Tom McClintock as a winning alternative. http://www.tommcclintock.com
1 posted on
08/15/2003 10:32:27 PM PDT by
XHogPilot
To: XHogPilot
Tom should make a deal to leave the race in return for becoming Arnold's chief of staff. Arnie can bask in success while Tom can do what he does best, clean up the State's fiscal mess.
2 posted on
08/15/2003 10:40:47 PM PDT by
Russell Scott
(A liberal believes a lie is truth, and is easily influenced by the Father of Lies, Satan)
To: XHogPilot
I'm not from California, but I agree with you. Arnold announcing Warren Buffett as his economic advisor speaks volumes about where he is coming from. Obviously it would be better to have Arnold over Gray Davis, but after listening to Tom McClintock, He seems to be a solid conservative who can explain to the everyday voters in Cali what it will take to reverse the damage the liberals have done to that great state. I sure hope McClintock somehow manages to win in California.
For those who think Arnold is the next Ronald Reagan, they must have never known what Ronald Reagan stood for.
I knew Ronald Reagan... And Arnold..... You are NO Ronald Reagan :-)
Go McClintock
3 posted on
08/15/2003 11:02:28 PM PDT by
MJY1288
(The Enemies of America can Count on the Democrats for Aid and Comfort)
To: XHogPilot
There really is no difference between Arnold and Cruz. Both are incompetent socialists, but voting for Arnold means you convince everyone in the middle that Republicans are just incompetent socialists as well.
Thinking Republicans take note.
To: XHogPilot
A Kennedy Republican.
6 posted on
08/15/2003 11:10:27 PM PDT by
TBP
To: XHogPilot
I'm confused by Arnold's comments, but I think he's made his biggest statement by remaining a Republican. That said, I agree with you that McClintock is our best candidate.
We need to support Tom while there's still time to get out the conservative and centrist vote. People underestimate the conservative core of California, and they're too quick to write off someone like Tom because he hasn't started spending his advertising dollars yet. Go Tom!
7 posted on
08/15/2003 11:15:56 PM PDT by
risk
To: XHogPilot
As you see, if you don't go with Arnold, you'll lose the
chick vote. Convincing Arnold to appear with Pee Wee
Herman alot is about the only way you're going to get
your women to vote for Tom.
9 posted on
08/15/2003 11:37:19 PM PDT by
familyop
(Essayons.)
To: XHogPilot
Those quotes are pretty bad, but in Arnold's defense read
this quote at the bottom of the page.
10 posted on
08/16/2003 2:12:27 AM PDT by
Nateman
(Socialism first, cancer second.)
To: XHogPilot
I am a fan of McClintock having heard him on John & Ken's show on KFI. I am also a realist and know that he can't win against Bustamante, to whom all the Dems will flock as a desperate move. That's why I'm voting for Arnold no matter how many anti-Arnold "quotes" can be scraped together to turn off possible Republican voters. We're playing into the Dems' hands by fragmenting the Republican vote, just as it was known that they wanted for a long time. Arnold was known for a long time to be a Republican, a mix of views - definitely not a Dem, since the Dems dissed him for his Republican views. If Arnold wins, McClintock will be able to advise that governor in a way he can't possibly advise Davis - or Bustamante.
To: XHogPilot
They should have done a lot more to Clinton than just impeach him. He should be in jail. He should have never been President; because he showed that he was not a leader in any sense of the word. He and Miss Hitlery screwed America over and as far as I can tell are still doing so.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson