Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ala. AG Won't Help Judge in Federal Fight
AP via Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | August 15, 2003 | Bob Johnson

Posted on 08/15/2003 2:30:08 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Lurking Libertarian
``I have a duty to obey all orders of courts even when I disagree with those orders,'' Pryor said in a statement. "


I often wonder if the death camp german soldiers said the same thing when ordered to drag men,women and children to their deaths in the gas showers or execution squads.
Civil disobedience is a good thing occasionally; America's founding fathers disobeyed the King of England and fought a war so men could put up the ten commandments in their offices, homes and public places and for over 200 years it worked well. And then the communist left wing secular humanists destroyed America's foundation.
When the house crumbles, where do they plan to be.
May the good Lord bless and keep Judge Roy Moore in his fight against the hateful secular liberal liars and thieves of America!
41 posted on 08/15/2003 6:40:17 PM PDT by wgeorge2001 ("The truth will set you free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
What is the basis of just law?

  1. ask your friendly neighborhood imam... and he will tell you mohammet, the koran and allah.
  2. ask a hasidic jew, and he will tell you the torah.
  3. ask a medieval european and you might hear "God and King Richard"
  4. Ask a member of the Church of England in 1778, and you might hear "God and King George".
  5. Ask a naturalist of colonial times, they might say "nature and/or nature's God, or nature AS God." looking to the natural drives of mankind as a ruler, freedom, liberty, and zones of personal anarchy.
  6. Ask a socialist and you will hear 'the greater good, the good of the children, or the general welfare'
  7. Ask a christian socialist (you know, "true" conservatives) and you may hear "the bible, the church, and its leaders who make moral decrees from the shores of another country, or apparently a stone monument in a courthouse in Alabama and the religious organizations that put it there."

Take your pick. Who you ask will determine your answer.

now answer this... What leads anyone to believe there was ever such a thing as ANY just law?

Scripture itself seems to indicate that "by the law shall no flesh be justified." The law of moses commanded the woman taken in adultery was to be stoned. Jesus ruled out the death penalty for that woman... apparently he, being God could rule justly, where mankind was not able.

We don't have an indisputable basis for human law being just. But we sure as heck fight about it a lot. No matter where YOU come down on fighting bout the basis, folks who are just as smart and learned will find room for disagreement.

Suffice it to say what is NOT the basis for just law... a stone monument in some court building in Alabama, kept by a Judge who is spending 125,000,000 to make a point that none of us can reach full consensus on.

the lemon test will be applied.

the supremes will either allow it to stay or not.

the judge will obey the ruling or face the appropriate consequences of the law he swore to uphold.

or the judge will get the ok from the supremes on the monolith as a testimony to history (ok by me really) with no endorsement of religion per se... and life will go on.

I can see the historical monlolith, art thingie, unless folks in his state have reason to believe it's a religious symbol... and win their day in court.

it is ridiculous... in some ways, understandable in others.

Salem Oregon, two years ago, would not light a christmas tree in the capitol, because it upset the tree huggers and wiccans...

WE need to resolve it once for all. Either everybody gets a monument or nobody does. endorsement of an particular religion, will never pass muster in the nation, though it may in the past.

We are no longer a homogenous mixture of various "christian" sects... but a multi-nationalist, multi-faithed pluralist republic.

...

42 posted on 08/15/2003 6:45:30 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (If we just erect a big, expensive stone monument... everything will be alright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; loohye; Jorge
BIBLES and GUNPOWDER: The foundations of the American Revolution
excerpts from Van Jenerette's comments at the FREE REPUBLIC Annual Conference 2001 at Seabrook Island S.C. on "The US Constitution and the Rule of Law." and his treatise on "Bibles & Gunpowder: The foundations of the American Revolution."
the
CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA - the most dangerous document ever written
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why did it take until July 1776 for a nation based on the principle of God given Individual Rights; Individual self Government by the people and governors who could only govern with the consent of the governed to happen?
The answer is actually simple - there are three basic reasons:

#1) The printing of the CHRISTIAN BIBLE - the most dangerous book ever printed
#
2) The 'invention' of GUNPOWDER - the great equalizer between peasants and tyrants
#
3) A very big OCEAN - between the OLD WORLD and the NEW WORLD

...theses three things directly set the field for the construction of:
the
CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA - the most dangerous document ever written


GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE - The Constitution provides the legitimate foundations of this country as a nation that is of the people and by the people.
 
We, the people, are the caretakers of the Constitution of the United States. Our charge is to pass on to future generations of Americans the rights and privileges that have been passed to us for over two centuries. It is a trust.
The notion that Supreme Court Justices, government officials or elite scholars are the only Americans who may offer worthwhile opinions on constitutional issues is far too narrow. At most, their years of study and review offer a snapshot view when put into perspective along side the centuries the document has existed.
The Constitution, and interpretations of it, belong as much to the proprietor of a small business, the homemaker, the college freshman, the taxi driver, and the newly naturalized immigrant as it does to any American.
We must guard this document and the Bill of Rights with vigilance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

REF: Myths that this nation was founded with a design to separate govenment from religion and the people from their arms.

I wish that most of you could have seen what I have seen in my life about this world we live in - we all might gain an appreciation or how fragile this Republic by the People really is. And, we all might have a better appreciation for the entire Bill of Rights and REAL AMERICAN HISTORY vs. the POLITICALLY CORRECT AMERICAN HISTORY that is reflected in today's media, public schools and colleges across this nation.

Both my wife and I have served in our military in combat zones in Korea and Desert Storm and we do not take this country with its freedoms and its dangers lightly. Today, she is a Congressional aide and professor of History and I teach college Political Science and Sociology. There is no greater cause for either of us than to hand down to our 4 children the right of individual self government.

The notion that the founding fathers, in designing the Bill of Rights were correct in the importance of freedom of the press and freedom from an official 'state church' yet incorrect when it came to the necessity of armed citizens in the space of two paragraphs reflects ignorance or duplicity at best. Our constitution should not be trifled with.

Our forefathers knew well that kings made state churches to perpetuate their power and that tyrants understood guns are designed to kill. This is still very true. The founders never mentioned 'a wall of separation between church and state' until Jefferson was quoted out of context. Because the founding fathers knew that the experiment they were proposing was contingent upon a moral majority of Christian citizens armed with Bibles and Gunpowder!

They didn't mention hunters, or sportsmen, or home protection - they were well aware that guns were intended to equalize people - the wealthy or the poor - the powerful and the weak. Pity the person who actually believes that the powerful would negotiate the domain of governments, commerce, individual rights and liberties out of some sense of benevolence or righteousness.

They didn't mention Allah or Buddah or Darwin, or Krishna - they were well aware that it was the Christian God who intended to equalize the people - the wealthy or the poor - the powerful and the weak.

Even a foolish person who examines the line of time for 'civilization' will be presented with the cold clear fact that participatory power sharing between the rulers and the ruled did not occur until two events and one singular condition existed: Bibles - Gunpowder - and a New World separated from the old by geographical circumstance.

This concept of individual self government where the people are 'endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable rights' equal and unquestionable did not spring forth when it did without reason.

To assume that the people in all of the ages of this earth who lived prior to 1776 submitted to royalty or tyrants because of satisfaction or cowardice is intellectually naive. This new nation came into being because the means coincided with the concepts of the Enlightenment.

Even the most powerful king, chief, or dictator understands the usefulness of negotiation when confronted with an armed Christian citizenry that makes two things clear; #1) citizens are willing to kill to secure certain rights and #2) that they, the citizens, are willing to die in the process.

If this nation is to remain free for future generations, the rights of the people to arm themselves and to freely exercise their religion both privately and publicly, is much more than merely a right to be exercised. It is a necessity to freedom that the means of securing all the rights of individual man and self government be obvious and openly apparent to all who govern.

However, founder John Adams added a warning to all of us today with regards to our ability to suststain our independence: ..."Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." October 11, 1798

I would suggest that anyone opposed to the BIBLE or GUNS in the hands of our citizens, review their early American history. If they do, they'll find that their rights to speak their minds freely owes much to the Christian Bible and the right to bear arms and the threat of death to tyrants provided only by a 'culture of guns' and the 'integration of Biblical scripture' in the hands of ordinary people who are free.

If a person truly loves liberty and freedom, the only thing that should be feared more than ordinary citizens who have the freedom to arm themselves is an armed government who is the only one who possesses arms, and a government who uses God to arm only themselves.


- Van Jenerette - www.jenerette.com



more thoughts...

"No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

"Independence can be trusted nowhere but with the people in mass."

"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?"

"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive."
- Thomas Jefferson



"Firearms stand next to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence."
- George Washington



"The said constitution shall never be construed to authorize congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams



"Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world."
- Daniel Webster



"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion...Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
- John Adams



"Religion and virtue are the only foundations, not only of all free government, but of social felicity under all governments and in all the combinations of human society."
- John Adams


"The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity.
- John Quincy Adams

"From the day of the Declaration...they (the American people) were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of The Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct."
- John Quincy Adams


"By our form of government, the Christian religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations of Christians are placed upon the same equal footing, and are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty."
- Samuel Chase

"I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth--that God Governs the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? "
- Benjamin Franklin

"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here."
- Patrick Henry
(...give me liberty or give me death!)

"The Bible is worth all other books which have ever been printed."
- Patrick Henry
(...give me liberty or give me death!)

"Bad men cannot make good citizens. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience are incompatible with freedom."
- Patrick Henry
(...give me liberty or give me death!)

"It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains."
- Patrick Henry
(...give me liberty or give me death!)

"The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun."
- Patrick Henry
(...give me liberty or give me death!)


finally, Thomas Jefferson also wrote:

"A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian; that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus."

"I have always said, I always will say, that the studious perusal of the sacred volume will make better citizens, better fathers, and better husbands."

Jefferson declared that religion is: "Deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support."




POST SCRIPT:

Clearly, it must be understood that the concept of 'individual-self-government' was a unique one in 1776.

It's basis, just as with anyother form of human 'government,' had to have a foundation of legitimacy.

In our American case, the legitimacy was founded on the Judeo-Christian idea of 'free will,' specific moral boundaries, and individual 'self-determinism' with the 'citizen' being the architect of their own destiny.

Now, had the founders - instead of being products of 'Western Civilization' and Judeo Christian civilization - been, say, Hindu or Muslim, or Atheists; could the concept of each individual having specific license to rights; granted by natures GOD, not other men; and the idea of construction rather than predestination - have taken root and grown as it has here in America?

Bottom line: Even if you don't believe in God or believe in Chritianity, you are better off living within a system where the majority of people - and the form of government - believes or even pretends the Judeo-Christain God exhists and is the origin of man's rights.


The American Revolution must continue today as a Resistance to those who advise to limit GUNPOWDER and BIBLES in todays American society or the constitution of our forefathers. Freedom will DIE if they succeed.

Our Republic...If we can keep it...
Van & Katherine Jenerette

43 posted on 08/15/2003 6:46:14 PM PDT by Van Jenerette (Our Republic...if we can keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
I don't agree with Ahbdullah Moore's theocratical fatwah. Should I be compelled by my government to subject myself to this theocrat's rule of law? We don't tolerate this type of subjection of the populace in Iraq, so why should we tolerate it in Alabama?
44 posted on 08/15/2003 7:01:41 PM PDT by Mushinronshasan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
If Moore spent $125 Million to defend his 10 Commandment monstrosity, he deserves to be tarred and feathered.

If he is lying about spending the money, he deserves to be thrown out of office.

Its got to be one or the other. Either way, he must go.
45 posted on 08/15/2003 7:12:30 PM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
All things are disputable, even truth. But that we dispute things is more a matter of election (for good or ill) and not an indication of the absence of a basis for just law.

Relativity of opinion is relativity of opinion, not a basis for law.




46 posted on 08/15/2003 7:34:34 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
And yet the same man voted to making breaking the Sabbath against the law as a member of the Virginia Legislature.

The only way to square Jefferson is to understand that his actions on behalf of the federal government and those of the state of Virginia were different.

47 posted on 08/15/2003 7:41:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
"Gimme your best exit strategy for Moore, short of a gun in the mouth..."

He gets overruled by the other justices on the Alabama Supreme Court, resigns and runs for President, taking the Alan Keyes slot in the conservatives that will never stand a chance parade.
48 posted on 08/15/2003 7:41:08 PM PDT by Those_Crazy_Liberals (Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
well then you answered your own question about jefferson. States rights went out the window with lincoln and the civil war. Whatever he said about or thought about state's rights, are pretty much "gone with the wind."

And they will never return again.
Whatever the feds rule, will be the law. Love it or hate it, it's all we have.

49 posted on 08/15/2003 7:46:16 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (If we just erect a big, expensive stone monument... everything will be alright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Whatever the feds rule, will be the law. Love it or hate it, it's all we have.

Cripes.

50 posted on 08/15/2003 7:49:32 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Whatever the feds rule, will be the law. Love it or hate it, it's all we have.

R-P's colors in full bloom!

51 posted on 08/15/2003 8:01:29 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I am not sure that one voting to avoid "breaking" the Sabbath, whatever that entailed at the time but I assume the curbing of commerce, has to do with the establishment of a religion (and establishment by the common usage then meant a religion - few felt they were separated from God back them - after all, Darwin was yet to stride this Earth). Maybe Jefferson thought that one day a week should be reserved for reflection and contemplation, and one's family. Granted, it sounds, and is, quaint, by the standards of the modern public square, but whatever.
52 posted on 08/15/2003 8:24:43 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
``If Judge Moore can't in good conscience comply with a lawful federal court order, he ought to resign,'' Lynn said.Reminds me of the defenses Nazis used at Nuremburg. Following legally issued orders. Barry Lynn (whom I personally loathe) is saying that illegality trumps immorality. Or morality? Sometimes conscience has to triumph over bad law.
53 posted on 08/15/2003 8:26:15 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
"The law" is subject to to change. These days, perhaps the personnel of the Courts have more to do with what that law is than the legislatures, on many issues that matter very much to so many folks. But personnel are subject to replacement. They don't yet live forever. Not yet. The trick is to get some new drugs that change that situation before I depart this mortal coil. Alas, I suspect I am too old to be in the hunt. My final exit is in the cards. And that is good, actually.
54 posted on 08/15/2003 8:30:14 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pram
Moore seems to be costing Alabama a LOT of money. Is it worth it?
55 posted on 08/15/2003 8:31:20 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Van Jenerette
Bottom line: Even if you don't believe in God or believe in Chritianity, you are better off living within a system where the majority of people - and the form of government - believes or even pretends the Judeo-Christain God exists and is the origin of man's rights.

Exactly.
And no doubt, those who work to purge our system and society of every trace of Judea-Christian values, if they should succeed, would not be very pleased with the result.

56 posted on 08/15/2003 8:32:32 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
"If you consult any reputable historian, they would find it a gross misstatement of the purpose of the First Amendment," he continued. "It is to protect the religious liberties of its citizens, not promote a public piety."

"Reputable" meaning secular humanist and anti-religion.

57 posted on 08/15/2003 8:34:39 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Is it worth it?

It's cheaper to drink hemlock.

58 posted on 08/15/2003 8:36:49 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: cornelis
What is the end game of all this? Do you have an opinion?
59 posted on 08/15/2003 8:37:23 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"The law" is subject to to change.
ain't that the truth.
60 posted on 08/15/2003 8:41:00 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (If we just erect a big, expensive stone monument... everything will be alright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson