Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Urge a Reprieve for the Hubble Space Telescope
NY Times ^ | 08/15/03 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 08/15/2003 6:36:49 AM PDT by bedolido

The Hubble Space Telescope, astronomy's vaunted time machine, was granted a conditional reprieve yesterday when an expert panel recommended that NASA consider sending a crew of astronauts at the end of the decade to extend its career, rather than dropping it out of orbit, as has been planned.

But the committee said its recommendation should be carried out only if the science to be performed in those additional years was able to beat competing proposals for new NASA science projects.

For the last 13 years, floating above the Earth's murky atmosphere, the telescope has beamed down crisp images of galaxies still forming at the dawn of cosmic time, peering into the hearts of galaxies and quasars in search of black holes, and investigating the mysterious "dark energy" that seems to be wrenching the cosmos apart.

"By any standards the H.S.T. has been a spectacular success — one of the most remarkable facilities in the entire history of science," said the committee, whose chairman is Dr. John Bahcall of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, in a report posted yesterday on the Web site of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

The committee members and other astronomers pointed out, however, that since the breakup of the Columbia shuttle, the telescope's future has been threatened because it is hostage to the ability of a space shuttle to pay periodic visits for maintenance and to replace old instruments with new ones.

Those repair missions would take the shuttle too far from the orbit of the International Space Station in case of trouble. As a result, the space agency should be prepared for a range of possibilities, the report said, from no more shuttle missions to two.

More is likely to be heard on that score in a couple weeks when the report of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board is released. But ultimately, Dr. Bahcall said, Congress, the White House and the NASA administrator will decide whether the shuttle may visit the telescope.

Dr. Anne Kinney, who is in charge of astronomy and physics in the space agency's office of space science, said that the Bahcall committee's report was "a good report."

"It reminds us that we need to be flexible," Dr. Kinney said. But she added that there was no budget for the extra mission and no precedent for the kind of competition that Dr. Bahcall and his colleagues had proposed.

"It's going to be a challenge," she said.

Astronomers were generally pleased with the report. Dr. Wendy Freedman, director of the Carnegie Observatories in Pasadena, Calif., called it "balanced and thoughtful."

Dr. George Rieke, an infrared astronomer at the University of Arizona, said the idea of a competition was "a sensible way to deal with limited resources."

Dr. Steven V. W. Beckwith, director of the Space Telescope Science Institute, praised the report, saying, "I couldn't be happier."

He added:"Everyone here is tremendously grateful to NASA for its support of the Hubble. We're delighted to have the chance to compete to continue this extraordinary story."

The story of the $1 billion Hubble, launched in 1990, is one of the great comeback stories in modern science. It was designed to take advantage of an orbital vantage point above the Earth's atmosphere, which smears images and blocks some wavelengths of light from reaching ground-based telescopes.

Once it was in orbit, however, astronomers were devastated to discover that the telescope had a flawed mirror.

The flaw was corrected in 1993 by sky-walking astronauts who, in effect, fitted the telescope's instruments with corrective lenses, enabling Hubble to attain the glory for which it was designed.

NASA has long planned to end Hubble's spectacular run and bring it down to make way in the budget for the James Webb Space Telescope, now scheduled to be launched in 2011. But some astronomers have urged that Hubble's life be extended, arguing that the telescope has grown even more productive in its years in orbit, and that the Webb could be delayed.

Moreover, the Webb is being designed for the infrared wavelengths that very distant galaxies would be emitting as they sped away in the expanding universe, not the visible wavelengths that Hubble sees so exquisitely.

The panel that NASA asked to review the issue also includes Dr. Barry Barish of the California Institute of Technology, Dr. Jacqueline Hewitt of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr. Christopher McKee and Dr. Charles Townes, both of the University of California, and Dr. Martin Rees of Cambridge University in England.

One of the main elements in their thinking, Dr. Bahcall said, was the realization that NASA might have to mount a mission to the telescope anyway at the end of the decade to attach a rocket to bring it out of orbit safely. The telescope is too big to be left to tumble out of orbit by itself.

The space agency had originally hoped to grab it with the shuttle, bring it back to Earth and put it in the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, but the Columbia disaster scuttled that option.

NASA is looking into developing a robotic spacecraft that could attach itself to the telescope, but many astronomers argued that the job could be done more reliably by astronauts. And if the astronauts are there anyway, they said, the telescope could be spiffed up for another few years of science.

Another element was the inspirational qualities that Hubble has both for astronomers and for the public, Dr. Bahcall said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; experts; hubble; reprieve; space; telescope; urge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: js1138
Ping! :-)
101 posted on 08/17/2003 8:04:52 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
2. Civilization will have sunk to a point where the crash won't be meaningful.

Unless yer the poor sap that happens to have his mud and straw hut in the designated landing zone...lol.

102 posted on 08/18/2003 10:22:32 AM PDT by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange! http://www.azfire.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Has anyone considered that the light from the initial bang has already gone out? It is possible that the birth certificate has faded away and that whatever evidience there was may have already sped by us.
103 posted on 08/18/2003 10:27:34 AM PDT by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange! http://www.azfire.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Actually we can "see" the echo from the Big Bang. It is the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Radiation. Sometimes noted as CMBR also.
104 posted on 08/18/2003 10:45:06 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I've read that, like ripples coming back off the bank of a lake, the reverberations are apparant...but wht I'm getting at is the actual event may have burnt itself out and it's direct evidence (that hubblesque technology would be able to detect) may have already blew by us, gone for good.
105 posted on 08/18/2003 10:49:33 AM PDT by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange! http://www.azfire.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Except everywhere you look is the "center" of the universe. (blown by us is not correct)

Here is an awesome link that you would enjoy! :-)

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
106 posted on 08/18/2003 11:01:35 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Bum Link....
107 posted on 08/18/2003 11:11:41 AM PDT by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange! http://www.azfire.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
It doesn't work for you?
108 posted on 08/18/2003 12:32:27 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
No, I tried to get there every way I could.....
109 posted on 08/18/2003 12:36:42 PM PDT by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange! http://www.azfire.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
I dont understand :-( I tried again and it worked fine. Here let me try a different link:

http://cosmos.colorado.edu/astr1120/l12S1.htm

There is also a link to the one I posted above from this site also. :-)
110 posted on 08/18/2003 2:07:49 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
That one worked...thank you!
111 posted on 08/18/2003 2:53:29 PM PDT by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange! http://www.azfire.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
"The earth has a non-trivial moon, which makes it wobble slightly in its solar orbit. Thus, the real center of mass of the earth-moon system is a bit off from the geographical center of the earth. Since the satellite also feels the tug of the moon, it is basically orbiting the earth-moon center of gravity. "

Yes, The center of mass of the Earth-moon system lies about halfway between the Earth's center and its surface. This 'wobble' of the Earth is responsible for the second tide each day - on the side opposite the moon.
112 posted on 08/22/2003 6:34:44 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson