[Physicist]

According to the Constituion, I believe he federal gov't's job is to print money, develop relationships with other countries, secure the borders and raise an army and not much else.

The Constitution also mentions the promotion of interstate commerce. Do you see much commerce going on right now?

I am more libertarian than all but a tiny handful of posters on this site, but if there's really no better answer to the fragility of our power grid than, "well, they're private companies; it's between them and their customers", then Bush would do well to nationalize the entire system today. (That's a "modest proposal", for those of you following along at home; of course there's a better answer.)

Market forces are preferrable to command economics, but in our economy the power grid underlies the market. Short circuit the power grid and you disconnect many of the forces you were counting on. Of course the government has a responsibility to get the power back on ASAP, if for no other reason than that the government can't fulfull its other responsibilities without it. If intervention can help facilitate that, then that's what should happen.

[Cheesel]

>>The Constitution also mentions the promotion of interstate commerce. Do you see much commerce going on right now?<<

Yep, I see it all the time. If you are going to tell me how awful the economy is, DON'T. Anyone who can't remember the Depression doesn't know what a bad economy is. No, I can't remember it because I wasn't around then. Yes, I am unemployed and have not had steady work since Jan. 2002.

If you really are Liberatarian, you should rail against the nationalization of any industry. Look at the disasterous results nationalization of industry has had.

The best way to deal with this is not to nationalize (did you know that 'nazi' was a slang term for 'nationalize'? Yep, 'cause it was something they loved to do). The most effective way in MHO is to have industry do it. I have seen this at work in my own field.