Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Schwarzenegger) Donations show liberal family ties
LA Daily News ^ | August 13, 2003 - 8:37:28 PM PST | Lisa Friedman

Posted on 08/14/2003 8:39:48 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: ElkGroveDan
Those are pretty small numbers compared to what he's worth. He seems not to be very involved in politics at all.
21 posted on 08/14/2003 9:20:32 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
With Schwarzenegger, CA remains in RAT hands. He gives to RATS because they're family--Gee, I just enjoy the way the Arnauldcrats smooth over this one. He surrounds himself with avowd RATS like Buffet. His H'weirdo ties know that he is a RAT and even stated that on national tv. Why he even has a well-known Kennedy family RAT wife. Yet, the Arnauldcrats still insist that he's a pubby even though he didn't vote in the last elections. He went so far as to say how ashamed he was of calling himself a "pub". And the Arnauldcrats still cling to wanting to believe that he is a pub. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
22 posted on 08/14/2003 9:20:35 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GmbyMan
Allow me to point out the most important difference to Repbulicans like myself.

Busmante (D)

Shwartzenegger (R)

Damn, I got to learn to spell Arnold's
name if he is going to be a governor.
23 posted on 08/14/2003 9:22:11 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
He is married to a Kennedy-sure he's giving them money-but not much given his deep pockets. As for Buffet, they are personal friends. The guy may be a Dem, and he attacks Bush for this reason, but he is considered brilliant even by Repubs. Arnolds taking a crash course in economics...I think.
24 posted on 08/14/2003 9:25:29 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Your guy is at 4%-do California citizens a favor and have him step down....he can't win and will only be a spoiler.
25 posted on 08/14/2003 9:27:52 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Arnold is a registered member of the Republican Party;therefore, he is a Republican.
26 posted on 08/14/2003 9:29:43 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
So what, he gave contributions to his family. Unless I read this wrong, he ONLY gave money to Democrats who are his family.
27 posted on 08/14/2003 9:31:22 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
I'm beginning to understand why California is so firmly in the hands of the Democrats. . . . . . .
28 posted on 08/14/2003 9:31:30 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (The joy of the Lord is my strength.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
Yep-the snatch defeat from the jaws of victory California Republican Party is alive and well.....to bad.
29 posted on 08/14/2003 9:33:05 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
but what is the sense of supporting a candidate who will undoubtedly lose

If people vote on principle McClintock would have the votes to win; thus he is electable. If people who would otherwise vote McClintock instead vote for someone they consider more electable McClintock won't have the votes to win, thus making him unelectable in a self-fulfilling prophecy.

It's like contributors deciding they won't give to a candidate because he can't raise funds. Well of course he can't if the contributors won't give to him! Whether the "prophecy" will come to pass depends how many folks it is pulling the rug out from under a candidate.

30 posted on 08/14/2003 9:34:49 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Mary Carey for Governor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Only in your eyes.
31 posted on 08/14/2003 9:35:10 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
Back in 1992, when I was a deluded Dem (although I had already moderated my views somewhat)I decided that the new Democrat was the answer to my prayers-yep Bill Clinton. My dear husband- a rock solid Repub-who keeps a signed picture of Reagan on his night stand supported Bush 1. However, I insisted that we contribute to Clinton's campaign. My husband didn't want to, but he did it anyway-for love (or perhaps lust). He also sent Bush 1 a check. So, I have no problems with Arnold giving money to Democrats who are family. Heck, Bill Clinton evev wasn't related to me. LOL
32 posted on 08/14/2003 9:39:46 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
To all McClintock supporters;

I would have thought the Simon defeat would have taught you all something....those who do not understand history doomed to repeat it over and over again.....
33 posted on 08/14/2003 9:42:11 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Nonsense. McClintock received more votes than any other statewide candidate in November. I personally don't have the time or the inclination to educate you on CA.
34 posted on 08/14/2003 9:46:15 AM PDT by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar. Div. An Hoa, Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
It's the total democrat control of California that got
us into this mess. Buffet doesn't exactly provide a
conservative solution to this problem.
35 posted on 08/14/2003 9:48:06 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
He is at 4%-according to the polls.
36 posted on 08/14/2003 9:49:04 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Re-elect Davis. Good point.
37 posted on 08/14/2003 9:51:10 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Also, we are talking about the present election-not the last one. Given the circumstances in this recall, McClintock can not win-especially with Simon running. Why is Simon running? The guy ran a terrible campaign and lost.... he should step down for the good of the party.
38 posted on 08/14/2003 9:52:21 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
I don't give money to Ted Kennedy. Tom McClintock does not give money to Ted Kennedy. You probably don't give money to Ted Kennedy. AND if giving money to RINO Riordan is counted as a GOP contribution.....?????? Yeah lukewarm is a compliment. How about raging brainless RINO droid? If they ever remake the Wizard of Oz, Ahhhhnold gets to play the Scarecrow and sing: "If I only had a brain..."
39 posted on 08/14/2003 9:53:10 AM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to beat RINOs and CINOs like rented mules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
He gave money to the Republican Party also, He and Riordin are personal friends.
40 posted on 08/14/2003 9:54:49 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson