Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lucent letting 1,500 more workers go
Daily Herald (Chicago) ^ | 08-14-03

Posted on 08/14/2003 5:46:31 AM PDT by Brian S

By Anna Marie Kukec Daily Herald Staff Writer Posted August 14, 2003

By late September, Lucent Technologies will have eliminated more than 60 percent of its global work force since 2001 - a total of 71,000 positions.

In filings Wednesday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Lucent reported it cut 69,500 employees between fiscal 2001 and last June. Another 1,500 will be gone by the end of this fiscal year on Sept. 30 - the majority of them managers.

When Lucent began restructuring in January 2001, it had 106,000 employees worldwide.

Roughly 10,500 of those people worked at its Naperville and Lisle facilities. That number fell to 5,200 last June.

So the dwindling ranks in Naperville and Lisle weren't surprised this week when the cutbacks continued.

Lois Porzio, a wireless software manager at Lucent in Naperville, was part of the team targeting positions for yet another round of layoffs.

"But I didn't know that I would be part of it," she said Wednesday.

The Batavia resident, a 19-year Lucent veteran, was among more than 200 employees let go Tuesday. The cuts were part of a plan announced last October that aimed for a global work force of 35,000 by the end of this fiscal year.

"These job reductions have been occurring across the business, and we continue to notify employees and take actions toward that goal," Lucent spokesman William Price said.

Price and other officials repeatedly refused to say which divisions were hit, the exact number of layoffs or other cutbacks planned in the Naperville and Lisle facilities.

The cuts in Naperville were expected, however, after Lucent took a major revenue jolt in the third quarter in Mobility, the business that develops wireless telecommunications equipment based in Whippany, N.J. Its development division, customer and marketing teams are in Lisle and Naperville.

Revenues for Mobility were $826 million - down 36 percent from last quarter and down 45 percent from the same period last year. Overall, the Murray Hill, N.J.-based telecom had third-quarter revenues of $1.96 billion, an 18 percent decline from the $2.4 billion last quarter. It had $2.95 billion in the same quarter last year.

Naperville Mayor George Pradel said he didn't receive the customary call from Lucent officials informing the city of impending layoffs.

"Not a word," Pradel said Wednesday.

Lisle Mayor Joseph Broda, who retired after 31 years as a senior manager for software development at Lucent, said he's concerned about the future of Lucent's Lisle facility.

"Sometimes they get confused over there and forget to tell us anything," Broda said.

Though Lucent officials have claimed for nearly a year that they were going to reduce their work force to 35,000, some employees remain skeptical.

"Is 35,000 going to be the number? Until the company is profitable, I wouldn't know what that final count would be," Porzio said.

Employees received 30 days of full salary and benefits and a severance package based on position and years of service.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/14/2003 5:46:31 AM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
They need to be laying off a lot more people than that. Terrible stock.
2 posted on 08/14/2003 5:48:41 AM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Willie Green is a huge Tupac fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Lucent had too many workers when I worked there. They had people who just attended meetings all day.
3 posted on 08/14/2003 5:49:00 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I recall that Lucent had at most of the old Bell Lab plants, virtually when they took over, changed everyone to PArt Time, Temporary employees. They would have done better to shrink the workforce THEN.
4 posted on 08/14/2003 6:13:46 AM PDT by GatekeeperBookman ("impossible and radically idealist notions" * inquire for clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I recall that Lucent had at most of the old Bell Lab plants, virtually when they took over, changed everyone to PArt Time, Temporary employees. They would have done better to shrink the workforce THEN.
5 posted on 08/14/2003 6:15:50 AM PDT by GatekeeperBookman ("impossible and radically idealist notions" * inquire for clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Lucent had too many workers when I worked there. They had people who just attended meetings all day.

Where were you, on the assembly line?

Meetings are basic communication tool. The trick is to make them productive.

Presumably, when you layoff 70% of your workforce you have done away with most of your dead wood and well into cutting away at your core abilities. This company and perhaps the industry is simply being put out of business. That is not good for the Telecoms or for the US, since it reflects the deep downturn in US economic activity.

If you think your stock is underperforming at 35,000 employees, you are going to be thrilled when the company drops to zero employees.
6 posted on 08/14/2003 6:23:18 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
>>They need to be laying off a lot more people than that. Terrible stock.

A friend is a financial guy there. He's buying stock. Take it for what it's worth.

He also thinks that this should be about the last round of downsizings. I think he had to cut 4 from around 30, and says it is really hard, because all that are left are really top-notch people.
7 posted on 08/14/2003 6:23:49 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Ping
8 posted on 08/14/2003 6:34:10 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
U.S. stocks ponder slew of data Thursday August 14, 9:30 am ET By Julie Rannazzisi NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- U.S. stock investors had a slew of economic numbers to ponder Thursday, with the latest data revealing mild inflation and a recovering job market.

The number of workers filing for state unemployment benefits remained under the key 400,000 mark for a second week, suggesting improvements in the labor market. Cornering the actual number, weekly claims rose 2,000 to 398,000 in the week ending Aug. 9.

Additionally, the overall producer price index rose a mild 0.1 percent in July and 0.2 percent at the core, which excludes the often- volatile food and energy components -- the biggest gain since March. Economists had expected a 0.1 percent increase both overall and at the core.

Finally, the U.S. trade deficit contracted by a larger-than-expected 4.7 percent to $39.5 billion in June as exports surged.

A number of analyst actions surfaced on Thursday. Wachovia Securities sliced its view on Dow stock McDonald's (NYSE:MCD - News) to a "market perform" rating from an "outperform" based on the fast food colossus' valuation.

In other moves, Smith Barney downgraded its rating on Dow component 3M (NYSE:MMM - News) to an "in line" from an "outperform," citing valuation as the primary reason. While Smith Barney notes that the diversified industrial company continues to impress "with strong execution" and "solid, above-average core growth," it concedes that further upside may be constrained by the stock's current valuation.

And SoundView Technology Group upped Texas Instruments (NYSE:TXN - News) to an "outperform" rating from a "neutral" on belief the chip company is the "best proxy for the semiconductor industry, [which] is in the process of a mild/gradual recovery."

Finally, CSFB cut its weighting on the technology sector to a "market weight" from an "overweight" due to recent rise in long-term interest rates and to higher optimism among market participants. CSFB believes technology stocks are feeling the weight of rising rates more than any other sector. Treasury issues extended their recent losses, ruffled by economic news showing that the U.S. economy is on the mend.

In recent trades, the 10-year Treasury note was down 14/32 to yield (CBOE:^TNX - News) 4.615 percent while the 30-year government bond inched down 2/32 to yield (CBOE:^TYX - News) 5.45 percent.

In currencies, the U.S. dollar was generally higher against its major counterparts, adding 0.3 percent to 119.50 yen while the euro sagged 0.4 percent to $1.1264.

9 posted on 08/14/2003 6:39:59 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
A few years ago, when Lucent stock started to dip a little, my financial advisor called me up and told that Lucent was trading at around $56 a share. "This is a huge, huge company, with a great future, and this stock will probably never see $56 again! What an opportunity! You should buy it!"

I bought a bit. And you know what? I think he was right -- that stock will never see $56 again!!!

10 posted on 08/14/2003 6:41:35 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
I disagree about most metings.

I have worked 15 years on the shop floor/machine maintenance and also 7 years as a designer/Engineer.

Most meetings I attended were simple things that one person with authority should have decided upon on the floor or on the drafting board, not in a 30 minute meeting where people not even involved in the manufacturing process have input that has to be refuted politely or risk losing employment for telling that idiot they are an idiot.

I would rather work under a leader than a manager.
11 posted on 08/14/2003 6:48:05 AM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
The first rule of meetings is to not have one unless it is absolutely neccessary.


12 posted on 08/14/2003 6:52:29 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; RaceBannon
Bingo! Bingo! A double bingo for you two.
13 posted on 08/14/2003 6:59:42 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"The first rule of meetings is to not have one unless it is absolutely neccessary."

The Second Rule Of Meetings is:

Meetings are events at which the minutes are kept and the hours are lost.

Michael

14 posted on 08/14/2003 7:20:12 AM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
aimed for a global work force of 35,000 by the end of this fiscal year.

It takes 35,000 people to make routers nobody buys and to maintain 5ESSs?

15 posted on 08/14/2003 8:06:44 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson