[WL-law]

I'm reasoning from the evidence not shown. What we see in her numbers is that she loses money, big money, from her career as a 'personality'. Therefore she must subsidize it with her other assets, i.e., her alimony and child-support income.

[Catspaw]

I'm reasoning from the evidence not shown. What we see in her numbers is that she loses money, big money, from her career as a 'personality'. Therefore she must subsidize it with her other assets, i.e., her alimony and child-support income.

She may have also set up the corp so it shows a loss, to offset income & profits from other sources.