[Catspaw]

I'm reasoning from the evidence not shown. What we see in her numbers is that she loses money, big money, from her career as a 'personality'. Therefore she must subsidize it with her other assets, i.e., her alimony and child-support income.

She may have also set up the corp so it shows a loss, to offset income & profits from other sources.

[goldstategop]

In any case there's no danger she'll be living on welfare any time soon. Although this news will make you think about who she really is when you read that next column of hers blaming the plight of the poor and the middle class on every Republican policy under the sun.