[billhilly]

I thought you would ask.

http://www.pe.com/ap_news/California/CA_Recall_Huffington_115034C.shtml

[WL-law]

Interesting. Arianna's income numbers show that she lives totally off her alimony, and that her 'public persona' is very much a money-losing proposition. Basically, her ex-husband pays to keep Arianna in the public eye. And she's in a sense spending her kid's money to feed her ego.

And then she says that since she has more "starpower", that the true green-activist types should roll over and support her candidacy, all the while while she jets about running in front of every camera she can.

Wow. That about says it all about the dem-leftist aristocratic mentality.

[Dante3]

She sure is unqualified. I would vote for her, however, if it was a runoff between her and the smut dealer.

[jammer]

There is no documentation in your post, but from what you wrote, her CORPORATION paid little or no taxes. That's not the same thing as "she paid no taxes." I despise her, but isn't that misleading? Or is there other information available?

[Blood of Tyrants]

Here is a direct link to the LA Times that you don't have to sign up for.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ariannatax14aug14,1,6892870.story?coll=la-headlines-california

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

What a laughing stock she is. Talk Radio will never let her live this down, they have a special hatred for Bennedict Arnold's.

[Dr. Scarpetta]

Arianna has been exposed. I don't know how she'll have the nerve to go on tv because she'll be asked non-stop tax and SUV questions. It really is an unbelievable story. She should withdraw.