Right... Are you seriously claiming that less than 10000 years ago Western Pennsylvania was a swamp full of cycads and giant amphibians and other coal-age thingies?
It's never too late: Glenn Morton's Story
Actually, most evidence for an "old Earth" comes from lines of evidence other than the geologic column.
Just out of curiosity, though, exactly where did you "learn" that the geologic column is somehow the only source of such information? Your reply may be instructive.
You do not base it upon dating methods such as Carbon 14
Of course not, because Carbon-14 dating caps out at around 60,000 years. Did you not now that?
or Potassium Argon because both do not work.
*snicker*. You are invited to present your evidence. Make sure that your "proof" does not consist of the obvious fact that K-Ar dating (or any other dating method) will give incorrect results if used on a clearly inappropriate sample.
The dates come from some man's theory
Yeah, nuclear physics, "just some man's theory"...
Perhaps you could also explain why samples dated by multiple independent methods (up to as many as ten, sometimes), all based on "different men's theories", give DATES THAT AGREE WITH EACH OTHER. What an amazing coincidence, eh?
and I don't care if you find it absurd, there is ample evidence that the earth is young.
Such as?
If you could get passed the geological column, then maybe you could see this.
If you could get off the geologic column, you might find a field where you won't keep making incorrect claims.