Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US tank crew cleared in April 8 attack on journalists' hotel in Baghdad
Agence France-Presse | 8/12/03

Posted on 08/12/2003 1:22:53 PM PDT by kattracks

A US military investigation has concluded that the crew of a US tank acted properly when it fired on a Baghdad hotel filled with foreign journalists April 8, killing two television cameramen, US officials said.

The investigation found that the tank fired at the Palestine Hotel because of reports a spotter was coordinating Iraqi fire from there, an official said.

A Ukrainian cameraman for Reuters television, 35-year-old Taras Protsyuk, and a Spaniard working for the Spanish television network Telecinco, 37-year-old Jose Couso, were killed by the shell blast.

Three other Reuters television journalists were wounded in the incident, which came amid heavy fighting in downtown Baghdad.

The Central Command's report on its investigation was not immediately made public, but a summary of its findings was sent to the governments of Spain and Ukraine, said the official.

"The report appears to confirm exactly what was initially reported in April," said the official. "The rules of engagement were not violated."

US forces picked up transmissions on a captured Iraqi radio of someone in the area directing Iraqi fire, a second official said.

The tank targeted the Palestine Hotel after seeing someone with binoculars on an upper floor acting "in a manner consistent with that of a spotter," the official said.

Images captured by the French television network France 3 showed the turret of an Abrams tank on the west side of the Tigris river turn toward the Palestine Hotel 300 meters (yards) away on the opposite bank, take careful aim and fire.

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, US military officials said the tank was returning hostile fire from the hotel. But journalists at the hotel disputed that account.

In Kiev, the Ukrainian foreign ministry said it had been informed of the investigation's findings.

"According to the American side, ... the shot was fired in self-defense and in complete conformity with the rules of combat," said ministry spokesman Markian Loubkivski, citing the US report.

"The American tank acted in response to information concerning the presence at the hotel of a spotter who was coordinating the Iraqi fire."

A separate investigation by the Committee to Protect Journalists, a watchdog group, concluded in May that the attack, "while not deliberate, was avoidable."

Pentagon officials and military commanders on the ground in Baghdad knew the hotel was full of journalists, but failed to warn the tank's commander, the committee said.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cleared; couso; iraq; journalists; palestinehotel; reuters; rulesofengagement; tankers; warcorrespondents

1 posted on 08/12/2003 1:22:54 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is a disgrace.

They should be reprimanded or even court marshalled for missing Chistiana Annapour.
2 posted on 08/12/2003 1:37:00 PM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Worse yet, Peter Arnett had already left...
3 posted on 08/12/2003 1:50:34 PM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
You gotta give credit where credit is due..
Four of the five "journalists" hit were Reuters pukes....

Semper Fi
4 posted on 08/12/2003 2:47:19 PM PDT by river rat (War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Cameraman plays `chicken' with tank gunner: by Donald Davison Or - `What were they thinking?

That cameraman should have been thinking: `Why is that gun aimed at me? Maybe I should quickly put the camera down sideways so the gunner can see it is a camera and not a missile launcher, and maybe I should also wave both my open hands back and forth so as to send the message that I am not a danger to him. Or, maybe I should get the hell out of here.

5 posted on 08/12/2003 2:58:52 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 ("Fahr na HO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
...to send the message that I am not a danger to him.

"I'm just sending [via satellite] great info to the [remains of the] Iraqi Army showing exactly where you are at...."

The other great line is "a female media type... suggested ...granted `Ancient Religious Status' because many member
of the media were staying there."

This media type has neglected to read historical criticisms of journalists in war by such successful military leaders as
William Techumseh Sherman.

6 posted on 08/12/2003 3:23:38 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Official CENTCOM report:

CENTCOM
August 12, 2003

PALESTINE HOTEL INVESTIGATION CONCLUDES

MACDILL AFB, Tampa: The investigation of the incident at the Palestine Hotel, Baghdad, Iraq on April 8th, 2003 is complete. The investigation was directed by the Land Component Commander, U.S. Central Command, and concludes that a tank from A Company, 4-64 Armor properly fired upon a suspected enemy hunter/killer team in a proportionate and justifiably measured response. The action was fully in accordance with the Rules of Engagement.

The following summary provides background and details of the event.

By 7 April, Coalition forces had begun to encircle Baghdad and had initiated thrusts into the city. On 8 April, Coalition forces were pushing into Baghdad and being met with fierce enemy resistance. The enemy was operating throughout the civilian areas of the city, firing a
spectrum of weapons at Coalition forces from the roofs and windows of surrounding buildings. The enemy was fighting without any regard to civilians or civilian structures. Coalition forces continued to fight their way toward the Tigris River, just across from the Palestine Hotel, an area of significant enemy contact.

The eighth of April was a day of very intense fighting for A Company, 4-64 Armor. Their immediate mission was to secure an intersection and deny the enemy the use of the Jamurohora Bridge. On A Company's first attempt to secure the intersection they were met with heavy enemy direct and indirect fire from Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs), mortars and small arms originating from prepared defensive positions (bunkers) and from within and atop surrounding buildings. As they approached the intersection, they suffered two Wounded in Action (WIA). The intersection was defended by almost a battalion of Iraqi Republican Guards. Fire was so intense that A Company pulled back and requested Close Air Support (CAS) and additional fire support. An A-1O aircraft dropped a Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) and strafed the enemy. A Company reattacked. The enemy continued to resist with much of their fire coming from the opposite bank of the Tigris River.

Spot reports were continually arriving at A Company concerning increasing enemy movements and activities along the opposite side of the Tigris River. Additional reports disclosed the discovery of potent Anti-Tank missiles. At this point, A Company had been in heavy fighting for several hours. The Company Commander was then advised by his Task Force Headquarters that an enemy radio had been recovered and that enemy transmissions were being monitored. Those transmissions indicated that A Company was being observed by an enemy spotter who was located across the Tigris River and was directing enemy forces and fires in their direction. While still under heavy mortar, RPG, and missile fire, the A Company Commander directed his people to scan the surrounding buildings to try to find the enemy observer. A Company personnel observed what they believed to be a enemy hunter/killer team on the balcony of a room on the upper floors of a large tan colored building. They also witnessed flashes of light, consistent with enemy fire, coming from the same general location as the building.

One 120mm tank round was fired at the suspected enemy observer position. Immediately following that, monitored transmissions indicated that the enemy observer was taking fire and coordinated enemy fire directed at A Company ceased. It was only some time after the incident that A Company became aware of the fact that the building they fired on was the Palestine Hotel and that journalists at the hotel had been killed or injured as a result. However, intelligence reports also indicated that the enemy used portions of the hotel as a base of operations and that heavy enemy activity was occurring in those areas in and immediately around the hotel.

Conclusions: A Company was under heavy enemy attack. The company had positive intelligence that they were under direct observation from
an enemy hunter/killer team. The activities on the balcony of the Palestine Hotel were consistent with that of an enemy combatant. They fired a single round in self-defense in full accordance with the Rules of Engagement. The enemy had repeatedly chosen to conduct its combat activities from throughout the civilian areas of Baghdad.

These actions included utilizing the Palestine Hotel and the areas immediately around it as a platform for military operations. Baghdad was a high intensity combat area and some journalists had elected to remain there despite repeated warnings of the extreme danger of doing so. The journalists’ death at the Palestine Hotel was a tragedy and the United States has the deepest sympathies for the families of those who were killed.


7 posted on 08/12/2003 4:03:23 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (Give our troops 2 parades: One for kicking enemy derriere. One for dealing with the enemy press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Good stuff!

I almost posted the AP version of this story until I caught this on a search.

8 posted on 08/12/2003 7:06:27 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson