Skip to comments.
Homelessness grows as more live check-to-check
USA Today ^
| 8/12/03
| Stephanie Armour
Posted on 08/12/2003 7:04:53 AM PDT by Gothmog
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:03 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Homelessness in major cities is escalating as more laid-off workers already living paycheck-to-paycheck wind up on the streets or in shelters.
As Americans file for bankruptcy in record numbers and credit card debt explodes, more workers are a paycheck away from losing their homes. Now the frail economy is pushing them over the edge. With 9 million unemployed workers in July, the face of homelessness is changing to include more families shaken by joblessness.
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004pres
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 341-352 next last
To: babyface00
Did you see the part where he was elected by the people to take the office? Guess what, unemployed people, they don't vote for presidents who they think are listening, just ask GB sr.
To: GodBlessRonaldReagan
You are right. A lot of this is due to poor life choices. I couldn't help but notice the family with four children who lost everything when the husband lost his job.
If you're going to have that many children, you certainly should build up some savings.
To: samuel_adams_us
that should be aren't listening.
To: Conservative til I die
But wait, you were there, right? You should have been able to discern between 100 and 4000.Yeah but you know how liberals are, "the actual number isn't important, what is important is that it could have been 4000."
To: Tokhtamish
Too bad the economy is continuing to improve.
125
posted on
08/12/2003 8:27:26 AM PDT
by
Conservative til I die
(They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
To: samuel_adams_us
And what costs are those? If you include all costs in that dollar then all you are spending is that dollar right? Explain to me where the hidden costs are.You've never owned a business or employed people, have you?
To: samuel_adams_us
Then they get what they deserve, aka Bill Clinton.
To: babyface00
I don't see anything about listening or job creation, or about making anyone fell better about themselves for that matter.
It's implied, can't you see it? I bet the Supreme Court could find it. You must be one of those heartless conservatives.
To: AppyPappy
We are giving China more of what they want, empowering them even more.
Here's one example. The PRC now makes most of the high quality magnets used to make smart bombs. We closed a plant in California for environmental reasons (the Desert Tortoise) and now are shipping another plant from Indiana to China:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/962493/posts Archibald Cox, Jr. is on the board of this corporation.
No one can get answers from DoD, the White House or anyone.
Duncan Hunter tried to pass a bill that would require DoD to make 65% of its purchases from American companies. Rumsfeld advised Bush not to sign it. Apparently, we have become very dependent upon other nations for our defense.
To: Trailerpark Badass
Actually my family owns several businesses.
To: babyface00
Or Ronald Reagan, who did a much better job than our current president and he even looked and sounded intelligent in front of the camera and in public.
To: comnet
What do you call it went the Governments take 40% to 50% of your income? That is the dumbocRATs economic policy for this country. They would like nothing more than to make it 100% of your income.
132
posted on
08/12/2003 8:32:51 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Clone Ann Coulter, the woman sent by God)
To: samuel_adams_us
Payroll taxes, workers' compensation insurance, overhead administrative costs associated with regulatory bullsh!t, etc.
To: Gothmog
There is nothing I can say or do to make a fundamentally ignorant person face grownup reality. I guess I'll just have to wait till you are older and hopefully more mature. You babble like someone who has never looked for a job or paid a bill or supported a family or really faced a problem.
Homelessness like this, child, has not been a problem for decades. It has gotten to be a major problem in the past three years as manufacturing has collapsed due to "free trade" policies. Last time I checked, mayors did not control international trade policy. Free traitors would always boast that these were jobs America could afford to lose, never wondering what happenned to the people who lost them. Well, this is what happens.
Maybe when you are old enough to shave you will be able to contribute something to this board.
To: Alberta's Child
Those are all part of that dollar, they aren't hidden costs. It's called the burdened rate right?
To: Conservative til I die
How's this the President's job?This is the Presidents job because of several reasons. First he is entrusted with teh enforcement of the laws through the attorney general who reports to him. There have been no prosecutions for perjury for those employing guest workers in violation of the law. Sworn statement no American is available for the position. Illegal immigrants work in the USA openly. The executive branch of government of which the president is the chief officer is charged with conducting foreign policy and that branch has continued subsidies for overseas investment, it has sponsored continuation of MFN status for China even though through currency manipulation, tariffs and non tariff barriers China has repeatedly engaged in predatory trade practices in the USA.
I note there were 30,000 new H1B visas approved so far this year. many of these were in IT. this industry already has over 100,000 unemployed and the rules of teh H1B visa program state an empoyer must swear there are no Americans available for the job.
These are jsut some of the reasons that GWB had better get to work to take this issue away from the Democrats or else we will eb stuck with RAT rule. I personally do not wish to see that.
136
posted on
08/12/2003 8:36:08 AM PDT
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: harpseal
I think you misunderstand my point.
Henry Ford's idea of paying his workers well enough that they could buy the cars they made was a marvelous one, but I can assure you that this idea would have gone nowhere if he also had to pay a myriad of overhead costs that had nothing to do with the production of automobiles.
To: samuel_adams_us
So which is it? Are you mad because the President won't listen or because he won't find jobs for people???? Like I said, it's not the President's job to make sure you get a job, to search for a job for you, or to make sure you have the proper training and c ertification for jobs.
138
posted on
08/12/2003 8:37:11 AM PDT
by
Conservative til I die
(They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
To: babyface00
Bump
139
posted on
08/12/2003 8:37:31 AM PDT
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("The board is set. The pieces are moving. We come to it at last...the Great Battle of our time.")
To: harpseal
"I am however appalled that Clinton's trade and immigration policies are still continuing over two years into the Bush administration. Why do we have any holdovers from Clinton?"
Ditto.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 341-352 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson