Skip to comments.
AOL Time Warner Moves to Eliminate AOL From Name
Yahoo finance ^
| Monday August 11, 1:51 pm ET
| Julia Angwin and Martin Peers
Posted on 08/11/2003 11:58:50 AM PDT by demlosers
By Julia Angwin and Martin Peers, Staff Reporters of The Wall Street Journal
NEW YORK -- AOL Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:AOL - News) is moving towards dropping AOL from the corporate name, returning it to "Time Warner."
In a surprising twist, management of America Online has been lobbying AOL Chairman Richard Parsons to drop AOL from the corporate name, arguing that the online service's brand name is being hurt by the identification of the corporate woes with the service.
Mr. Parsons is considering the division's request, say people close to the situation. AOL's board is scheduled to meet late next month and could consider a name change at that time. While the board's response isn't clear, one person familiar with the situation says it's unlikely that the board would oppose a name change if the AOL management was in favor.
People from within the old Time Warner have been pushing to drop AOL from the corporate name, arguing that it was a stain on the company's reputation given the online division's woes, including government investigations into its accounting. Mr. Parsons had demurred and had been expected to wait until the investigation was concluded.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aol; aolsux; timewarner
1
posted on
08/11/2003 11:58:51 AM PDT
by
demlosers
To: demlosers
Will this in any way affect the number of those junk AOL discs I get in my mail?
To: demlosers
AOL cooked their books for years, and they conned a lot of people into going along with that merger. Many execs. probably made a lot of money on that deal, and the shareholders are left holding the bag.
I have no sympathy for AOL or Time Warner. AOL is a crap product, and Time is a liberal propaganda machine.
3
posted on
08/11/2003 12:18:18 PM PDT
by
Radix
To: demlosers
Now if they could just remove AOL from their balance-sheet...
4
posted on
08/11/2003 12:20:20 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: Graybeard58
Will this in any way affect the number of those junk AOL discs I get in my mail?I certainly hope not...they make great coasters and fantastic shooting range targets.
5
posted on
08/11/2003 12:20:32 PM PDT
by
WestPacSailor
(I used to be clueless but I've turned that situation around 360 degrees.)
To: Graybeard58
No. The problem is that investors are focusing at the failing and scandal-plagued AOL division rather than other healthier divisions of the company such as HBO, Warner Brothers, Time Warner Cable and RoadRunner internet service. The stick symbol is AOL.
They are lumped into "tech stocks" in media reports, ignoring that most of the company is not a traditional tech company. A name change would help diminish AOL's standing within the corporation.
Ironically, AOL bought Time Warner but Time Warner executives have been forcing out AOL's executives ever since and Time Warner people now control the company almost as much as they did before they were bought. Renaming the company makes sense to me.
6
posted on
08/11/2003 12:22:09 PM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
(http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
To: Tall_Texan
The stock symbol is AOL but AOL does use a stick-figure symbol too.
7
posted on
08/11/2003 12:24:02 PM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
(http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
To: Radix
I tend to agree with you. On an interesting side note, though, most of their polling data showed a heavy conservative preponderance among their subscribers. After Time-Warner took over, the polls that they have at their introductory screens became heavily skewed so as to mitigate and prevent any possible conservative response. Nothing was ever asked 'straight up'. The premises were always bizzare and blatantly biassed. You are right, Time-Warner has not credibility, and AOL was sucked down with it. AOL's Steve Case was ideologically just as bad obviously, but didn't know how to be as devious as the media-types.
8
posted on
08/11/2003 12:34:50 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
To: demlosers
I bet the executives at AOL Time Warner would like to eliminate the AOL division altogether. They wish they had never merged I am sure. Probably the worst merger of all times.
9
posted on
08/11/2003 12:55:25 PM PDT
by
Uncle Hal
To: demlosers
The AOL Titanic deck chair shuffling team moves into action.
10
posted on
08/11/2003 1:00:17 PM PDT
by
xp38
To: demlosers
Just as soon as DSL is available in my area I will elimimate AOL from my computer.
To: Hurricane
I live in a major metropolitan area. There are two high speed carriers in this area. AOL DSL and later, Comcast cable.
I had Comcast install but forutnately did not discontinue my AOL account right away. Good thing, even after three visits by techs, Comcast cable is a dog in my area.
12
posted on
08/11/2003 1:12:12 PM PDT
by
CWOJackson
(The World According to Garp isn't that bad when compared with The World According to Todd.)
To: demlosers
The whole AOL thing was the most brilliant move of anyone involved in the dot-com bubble.
It may have happened by accident, but if so, it was the most shrewd accident in history.
At the peak of the bubble, AOL, flush with bubble cash, bought Time-Warner, a company that actually had assets, products, etc. Now AOL is on it's way to worthlessness, but still has the assets of Time-Warner.
Talk about timing the market.
13
posted on
08/11/2003 1:19:45 PM PDT
by
MalcolmS
To: Hurricane
14
posted on
08/15/2003 8:05:43 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson