Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AOL Time Warner Moves to Eliminate AOL From Name
Yahoo finance ^ | Monday August 11, 1:51 pm ET | Julia Angwin and Martin Peers

Posted on 08/11/2003 11:58:50 AM PDT by demlosers

By Julia Angwin and Martin Peers, Staff Reporters of The Wall Street Journal

NEW YORK -- AOL Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:AOL - News) is moving towards dropping AOL from the corporate name, returning it to "Time Warner."

In a surprising twist, management of America Online has been lobbying AOL Chairman Richard Parsons to drop AOL from the corporate name, arguing that the online service's brand name is being hurt by the identification of the corporate woes with the service.

Mr. Parsons is considering the division's request, say people close to the situation. AOL's board is scheduled to meet late next month and could consider a name change at that time. While the board's response isn't clear, one person familiar with the situation says it's unlikely that the board would oppose a name change if the AOL management was in favor.

People from within the old Time Warner have been pushing to drop AOL from the corporate name, arguing that it was a stain on the company's reputation given the online division's woes, including government investigations into its accounting. Mr. Parsons had demurred and had been expected to wait until the investigation was concluded.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aol; aolsux; timewarner

1 posted on 08/11/2003 11:58:51 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Will this in any way affect the number of those junk AOL discs I get in my mail?
2 posted on 08/11/2003 12:12:59 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
AOL cooked their books for years, and they conned a lot of people into going along with that merger. Many execs. probably made a lot of money on that deal, and the shareholders are left holding the bag.

I have no sympathy for AOL or Time Warner. AOL is a crap product, and Time is a liberal propaganda machine.
3 posted on 08/11/2003 12:18:18 PM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Now if they could just remove AOL from their balance-sheet...
4 posted on 08/11/2003 12:20:20 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Will this in any way affect the number of those junk AOL discs I get in my mail?

I certainly hope not...they make great coasters and fantastic shooting range targets.

5 posted on 08/11/2003 12:20:32 PM PDT by WestPacSailor (I used to be clueless but I've turned that situation around 360 degrees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
No. The problem is that investors are focusing at the failing and scandal-plagued AOL division rather than other healthier divisions of the company such as HBO, Warner Brothers, Time Warner Cable and RoadRunner internet service. The stick symbol is AOL.

They are lumped into "tech stocks" in media reports, ignoring that most of the company is not a traditional tech company. A name change would help diminish AOL's standing within the corporation.

Ironically, AOL bought Time Warner but Time Warner executives have been forcing out AOL's executives ever since and Time Warner people now control the company almost as much as they did before they were bought. Renaming the company makes sense to me.

6 posted on 08/11/2003 12:22:09 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
The stock symbol is AOL but AOL does use a stick-figure symbol too.
7 posted on 08/11/2003 12:24:02 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Radix
I tend to agree with you. On an interesting side note, though, most of their polling data showed a heavy conservative preponderance among their subscribers. After Time-Warner took over, the polls that they have at their introductory screens became heavily skewed so as to mitigate and prevent any possible conservative response. Nothing was ever asked 'straight up'. The premises were always bizzare and blatantly biassed. You are right, Time-Warner has not credibility, and AOL was sucked down with it. AOL's Steve Case was ideologically just as bad obviously, but didn't know how to be as devious as the media-types.
8 posted on 08/11/2003 12:34:50 PM PDT by Paul Ross (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!-A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I bet the executives at AOL Time Warner would like to eliminate the AOL division altogether. They wish they had never merged I am sure. Probably the worst merger of all times.
9 posted on 08/11/2003 12:55:25 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The AOL Titanic deck chair shuffling team moves into action.
10 posted on 08/11/2003 1:00:17 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Just as soon as DSL is available in my area I will elimimate AOL from my computer.
11 posted on 08/11/2003 1:07:04 PM PDT by Hurricane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hurricane
I live in a major metropolitan area. There are two high speed carriers in this area. AOL DSL and later, Comcast cable.

I had Comcast install but forutnately did not discontinue my AOL account right away. Good thing, even after three visits by techs, Comcast cable is a dog in my area.

12 posted on 08/11/2003 1:12:12 PM PDT by CWOJackson (The World According to Garp isn't that bad when compared with The World According to Todd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The whole AOL thing was the most brilliant move of anyone involved in the dot-com bubble.

It may have happened by accident, but if so, it was the most shrewd accident in history.

At the peak of the bubble, AOL, flush with bubble cash, bought Time-Warner, a company that actually had assets, products, etc. Now AOL is on it's way to worthlessness, but still has the assets of Time-Warner.

Talk about timing the market.
13 posted on 08/11/2003 1:19:45 PM PDT by MalcolmS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hurricane

14 posted on 08/15/2003 8:05:43 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson