I don't know about 'Christ's ambassadors', but anti-evos are notorious for mangled and misleading quotations, as you know.
IMO, it's one of the principle reasons that they aren't taken very seriously by scientists. That kind of behavior doesn't usually pass peer review.
I don't know about 'Christ's ambassadors', but PRO-evos are notorious for mangled and misleading PILTDOWN MAN, as you know as well.