I'm trying to reach an agreement on an issue of fact (e.g. whether precambrian fossils do or do not exist).
If you see that as "stalking - harassment - disruption", then I submit that you're not entirely clear on what scientific discussions actually involve. You see, in scientific discussions, people actually get to challenge your statements if they seem inaccurate. If that sort of thing upsets you, perhaps you'd best not participate.
Perhaps you should mailorder some precambrian fossils of your own. This might help you come to terms with their existence.
Blaming me for your mental problem too !
Okay, I'll bite -- where, exactly, do you believe I did such a thing? Be sure to quote me.
If you see that as "stalking - harassment - disruption", then I submit that you're not entirely clear on what scientific discussions actually involve. You see, in scientific discussions, people actually get to challenge your statements if they seem inaccurate. If that sort of thing upsets you, perhaps you'd best not participate.
If you call mud dwelling sludge animals - remains precambrian fossils do you think that is ok ?
I mean real fossils of higher species than worms and mollusks !
133 posted on 08/11/2003 12:23 PM PDT by f.Christian
* Something * EVIDENCE of substance - relevance --- REALITY // sanity !
Serious mental problems (( denial // projection )) --- seeing things (( delusians )) !