Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ninenot
This is hardly a sober, authoritative source.

By the author's logic, the jury which returned a not guilty verdict in the O. J. Simpson murder case intended to signal that murder should be legal.

6 posted on 08/11/2003 7:20:06 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Lucky
True, but if this ruling took place, wouldn't there be some precedent to follow?

I am surprised that Boortz hasn't picked up on this.

I will do some research. See if we can get some independent verification.

7 posted on 08/11/2003 7:22:10 AM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
Hardly, the case demonstrates that Tax paying is "voluntary".
9 posted on 08/11/2003 7:24:22 AM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
Agreed that the source has an interest.

But that does not serve to deny the truth of the report. Of course, there's a fair amount of "detail" missing...
12 posted on 08/11/2003 7:26:54 AM PDT by ninenot (Progressives make mistakes. Conservatives don't correct them.--Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
By the author's logic, the jury which returned a not guilty verdict in the O. J. Simpson murder case intended to signal that murder should be legal.

Um, I'm not so sure about that. Now I didn't follow the O.J. trial so I don't know what was said, but I suspect the argument presented to the jury was that O.J. didn't do it. I would be surprised if the argument was that the legal code permitted him to commit murder.

But I agree with you; this case needs more careful attention and analysis.

18 posted on 08/11/2003 7:29:26 AM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
"By the author's logic, the jury which returned a not guilty verdict in the O. J. Simpson murder case intended to signal that murder should be legal."

They didn't? I sure took it that way. Especially if certain racial pre-requisites are met. It looked to me like Regenald Denny and about 100,000 minority youth took it that way too. When they were done there were 43 more murders in La La Land. Off hand was anyone convicted for any of them. On of them most horrible, the infamous "brick to the head" was prosecuted and only got the creep who did it a few months in jail. (He's back now on another murder).

Anyway, I get your point and your right. But I'm not sure the OJ case is a very good example. It's the counter-example.

83 posted on 08/11/2003 8:59:47 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
No, the jury in the O.J. case just proved they were morons.

127 posted on 08/11/2003 8:07:33 PM PDT by Fledermaus (DimbulbRats have a mental disease - Arrested Brain Development.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
It does sound like jury nullification.
135 posted on 08/11/2003 11:19:05 PM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky
This is hardly a sober, authoritative source.

I know the old grey lady ain't as credible as she used to be, but I don't know of anyone who's yet calling it a tabloid.

140 posted on 08/12/2003 1:06:53 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson