[mattdono]

True, but if this ruling took place, wouldn't there be some precedent to follow?

I am surprised that Boortz hasn't picked up on this.

I will do some research. See if we can get some independent verification.

[mattdono]

I found a limited amount of information. Google has a cached page of the court calendar (here) and another cached page that shows the hearing was scheduled for July 24 at 2:00 PM (here)...

Also found an article talking generally about the case. Basic detail, but here is the here.

[taxcontrol]

Jury verdicts do NOT set precedents.

Court rulings do - since the Judge did not RULE in this case, there is no precedent.