Skip to comments.
Voters Will Have To Show ID On Sept 9
Mobile Register ^
| 8-9-2003
| Rhoda A Pickett
Posted on 08/09/2003 4:54:17 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
One step in the right direction.
1
posted on
08/09/2003 4:54:17 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
The only person I'll show my ID to is a licensed therapist.
To: Paul Atreides
So, you're not gonna vote Sept 9?
3
posted on
08/09/2003 4:58:44 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Yes, good news indeed. If a person can't produce even ONE item on that list, they have no business voting, since they probably DON'T live in that precinct.
Let them cash a check, rent a video, etc without SOME form of ID.
4
posted on
08/09/2003 5:00:03 PM PDT
by
PetroniDE
(Kitty Is My Master - I Do What She Says)
To: blam
Never mind. I was making a psychology joke. Just my superego getting the better of me.
To: blam
I don't see the Matricula Consular listed - how dare Alabama disenfranchise illegal aliens.
6
posted on
08/09/2003 5:02:17 PM PDT
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: blam
Democrats, though, have opposed it, saying that black voters, particularly those old enough to recall the pre-civil rights era of poll taxes and literacy tests, would be intimidated and discouraged from voting. Dont the Democrats have any white people committing voter fraud for them? If not, then they are racists.
7
posted on
08/09/2003 5:02:25 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
(You are the audience. I am the author. I outrank you! -Franz Liebkind, The Producers)
To: blam
Many Democrats, though, have opposed itWhy do you suppose that is?
I know it's not because of the reasons given.
8
posted on
08/09/2003 5:02:46 PM PDT
by
StACase
To: Paul Atreides
The only person I'll show my ID to is a licensed therapist.Too bad. Your vote would be missed. And it must be tough for you to never be able to fly or rent a car.
This is an outstanding idea. In Massachusetts during the 02 election cycle, a federal judge ruled that it is discriminatory to ask for an ID at a polling place. His reason was essentially that Hispanics and other immigrant population -- who often are wary of showing ID -- would be intimidated into not voting.
So fundamentally, in Massachuseetts, it is no longer necessary to be a citizen to vote in American elections.
We have to show ID when we fly. It is just common sense that we should have to show a valid ID to vote. The alternative is an invitation to election fraud.
9
posted on
08/09/2003 5:04:37 PM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Maceman
I was making a joke, using the psychological term "Id."
To: Maceman; blam
According to Freud, we are born with our Id. The id is an important part of our personality because as newborns, it allows us to get our basic needs met. Freud believed that the id is based on our pleasure principle. In other words, the id wants whatever feels good at the time, with no consideration for the reality of the situation. When a child is hungry, the id wants food, and therefore the child cries. When the child needs to be changed, the id cries. When the child is uncomfortable, in pain, too hot, too cold, or just wants attention, the id speaks up until his or her needs are met.
To: blam
A valid Alabama permit to carry a pistol or revolver. Very sensible. "Of course I can vote; here's my firearm carry permit." "Yes, sir! Right this way! Here, let me hold that curtain for you!"
To: blam
Voter fraud in Alabama takes a major step backwards. I just wonder if any democRAT is electable in an honest election.
13
posted on
08/09/2003 5:13:51 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: Paul Atreides
Good one! hehehe!
To: Paul Atreides
"Never mind. I was making a psychology joke. Just my superego getting the better of me."
Well, duhhh! I have done quite a bit of reading in psychology, but that mention of showing your id went right past me. Context misdirected me. Good one, Paul!
To: Paul Atreides
16
posted on
08/09/2003 5:15:41 PM PDT
by
evolved_rage
(Davis is a POS!)
To: Paul Atreides
It's not funny when you have splain it!
To: blam
I'm glad at least one state is exercising some common sense and not kowing to the racebaiters.
18
posted on
08/09/2003 5:16:58 PM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Maceman
"His reason was essentially that Hispanics and other immigrant population -- who often are wary of showing ID -- would be intimidated into not voting." Uhh, isn't that the idea? It is my understanding that only American citizens are qualified or legally able to vote in our elections, so why are we making laws to protect the illegal votes of illegal people?
19
posted on
08/09/2003 5:21:41 PM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: reflecting
I know. I've been on a humor high, after watching ZsaZsa HuffnPuff make a fool of herself today.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson