To: nmh
If the Pentagon had said it used napalm and later it came out that this isn't technically napalm but something that acts in the same way, they would have been accused of lying.
The way the libs twist things around and parse words, they will accuse anyone of lying any time they open their mouth. Kinda ironic since they are the ones who lie so glibly.
61 posted on
08/09/2003 3:11:42 PM PDT by
kayak
(God bless President Bush, our military, and our nation!)
To: kayak
If the Pentagon had said it used napalm and later it came out that this isn't technically napalm but something that acts in the same way, they would have been accused of lying. I doubt that. Everyone there called this kerosene based stuff "napalm." As for damage to the environment... how can you damage sand?
To: kayak
The oppostion will jump on anything, even the absurd to appear self righteous. They will NEVER admit they were wrong. They will continue to nit pick anything that comes their way. I don't object to napalm (sp). We went in there for a purpose and this is one of the many tools to help spare life and accomplish that. Nothing wrong with that.
74 posted on
08/09/2003 4:03:14 PM PDT by
nmh
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson