Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh
If the Pentagon had said it used napalm and later it came out that this isn't technically napalm but something that acts in the same way, they would have been accused of lying.

The way the libs twist things around and parse words, they will accuse anyone of lying any time they open their mouth. Kinda ironic since they are the ones who lie so glibly.

61 posted on 08/09/2003 3:11:42 PM PDT by kayak (God bless President Bush, our military, and our nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: kayak
If the Pentagon had said it used napalm and later it came out that this isn't technically napalm but something that acts in the same way, they would have been accused of lying.

I doubt that. Everyone there called this kerosene based stuff "napalm." As for damage to the environment... how can you damage sand?

63 posted on 08/09/2003 3:16:15 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: kayak
The oppostion will jump on anything, even the absurd to appear self righteous. They will NEVER admit they were wrong. They will continue to nit pick anything that comes their way. I don't object to napalm (sp). We went in there for a purpose and this is one of the many tools to help spare life and accomplish that. Nothing wrong with that.
74 posted on 08/09/2003 4:03:14 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson