To: syriacus
The rightness or wrongness of abortion, itself, does not depend on its increasing or decreasing the chances of breast cancer. Correct.
It would be terrible if we learned that these studies, which show there is no connection between abortion and cancer, were undertaken by people with an agenda.
Sad to say, there are people on both sides who have an agenda with regard to the outcome, reporting and interpretation of studies of this question. Sad to say, because science should be impartial, going wherever the data lead.
15 posted on
08/09/2003 3:45:29 PM PDT by
RJCogburn
("I need a good judge."..............Lucky Ned Pepper)
To: gcruse
FYI.
16 posted on
08/09/2003 3:46:35 PM PDT by
RJCogburn
("I need a good judge."..............Lucky Ned Pepper)
To: RJCogburn
because science should be impartial, going wherever the data lead. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yup........should be.
17 posted on
08/09/2003 3:47:30 PM PDT by
Skooz
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: RJCogburn
Sad to say, because science should be impartial, going wherever the data lead.Absolutely!!!!
Anyone who deliberately distorts results, is (eventually) distrusted by honest people.
Of course, there can be honest disagreements in how to collect and interpret data.
22 posted on
08/09/2003 7:10:39 PM PDT by
syriacus
(Schumer belongs to a group that excludes women from full membership.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson