Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger as Soccer Mom
PoliPundit.com ^ | 8/9/03 | PoliPundit

Posted on 08/09/2003 7:03:40 AM PDT by NYC Republican

No one seems to have a phrase to describe Arnold's politics. Is he a "conservative," a "moderate," a "liberal" or a "pragmatic libertarian?"

None of the above. Arnold Schwarzenegger is... a Soccer Mom!

Your prototypical Soccer Mom isn't a hate-the-greedy-corporations Democrat. Heck, her husband is probably a middle manager at Procter & Gamble. She's a "fiscal conservative," in the sense that she doesn't want more taxes and regulation. She doesn't like affirmative action either, since it goes against her sense of fairness and threatens her childrens' future.

On the other hand, she doesn't want to be seen as a meanie. She thinks Republicans are too hard-edged on some issues. She wishes they were more "tolerant" of minority groups like gays and blacks. She's pro-choice, although she doesn't want abortion to be a widespread practice. She is, of course, an "environmentalist." And she's not averse to Big Government programs like Medicare and Social Security. An easy way to win her vote is to claim that some big-spending entitlement is "for the children." She doesn't see why ordinary people need assault rifles, but she can see why pilots should have pistols.

Now look at Arnold's stated beliefs - vague as they are - and see how they dovetail nicely with Soccer Mom values. When he comes out with detailed policy prescriptions, I bet they'll reflect Soccer Mom values too.

Democrats should be scared of Arnold. He has a massive advantage when it comes to the male vote. If he can appeal to Soccer Moms, he can also steal away women voters who ordinarily provide Democrats with their margin of victory


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: recall; schwarzenegger; soccermom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: NYC Republican
Wonder if Arnold's twin brother could win the Lt. Governorship?
21 posted on 08/09/2003 8:35:52 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (It is just plain just that we remove unjust Justices-the survival of America depends on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
I see your points ... what is the answer, though? Is it a lost cause?
22 posted on 08/09/2003 8:37:03 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Wonder if Arnold's twin brother could win the Lt. Governorship?

Why not? He's a celebrity, and that seems to be the only qualification some FReepers need to support a candidate.

23 posted on 08/09/2003 8:44:46 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Wonder how their parents could tell which was which?
24 posted on 08/09/2003 9:20:26 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (It is just plain just that we remove unjust Justices-the survival of America depends on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Schwarzenegger is about equal to Joe Lieberman or Arlen Specter. That's the better analogy.

Either one of those would be an improvement over Davis, as far as I can tell from this remove. I would get tired of listening to Lieberman's voice after a while, if he were governor of my state.

25 posted on 08/09/2003 10:25:21 AM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
When NIXON did the realignment strategy you espouse, the right came to power but rolled back next to nothing the left had done with a mixes ideology democratic party.

You can never turn back the clock. The only answer at this point is to move forward and improve the situation in that way, with new ideas. We cannot get rid of Medicare, for example. It just is not going to happen. We can (and some Republicans are) proposing "modifications" of Medicare, to make it more responsive to the market, and less costly to the taxpayer.

People don't want to go back to what they perceive (and which in fact were to some of them) to "the bad old days". But if you can package your ideas so that you are proposing "good new days", that's another matter entirely, and it will get an audience.

26 posted on 08/09/2003 10:31:51 AM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Just your average soccer mom.

27 posted on 08/09/2003 10:55:32 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR (Don't tread on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: afz400
Well, he said two days ago that Bush was doing "a great job." I doubt that he'll rant and rave about how California's problems are Bush's fault like every Democrat officeholder in CA.
28 posted on 08/10/2003 6:03:15 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Willie Green for President...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe
Mea culpa......In that case..

LET THE GAMES BEGIN!!!!!


29 posted on 08/10/2003 8:00:16 PM PDT by China Clipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson