Posted on 08/09/2003 6:50:09 AM PDT by mountaineer
"Living History" has far outpaced U.S. Sen. John McCain's memoir "Faith of My Fathers" (1999) and is closing in quickly on "My American Journey" by Gen. Colin Powell, which has 1.6 million hardback copies in print after eight years. Like the secretary of state's book, Clinton's has fueled speculation of a presidential run, either in 2004 or 2008. Former President Bill Clinton's wife insists that's "not in the cards," but she does see something positively political in the crowds of up to 2,000 people who have given her rock-star receptions at book-signings across the country.
"I think it's a reflection of how people are feeling not only about me and the book," she says, "but about the state of the country right now."
Having signed more than 20,000 books, by her own estimate, Clinton comes to Atlanta on Monday.
....
Q: You've set the bar pretty high. Do you think your husband's getting nervous about whether his memoir [to be published next year] will do as well?
A: Oh, I don't think so. I think he's just trying to get it finished. I'm very confident it will do extremely well.
Q: Why do you think you and your husband have become such polarizing figures in politics?
A: I think some of it is in part because of the positions we have taken and championed over the years. Some of it is because we are progressives, and some people get very intense in their opposition to the positions we take. I think it has a lot to do with the ongoing struggles in our country over what direction we should be heading.
Q: Does the intensity of the hatred ever scare you?
A: It has a few times. . . . I've come to just accept the fact that for both ideological and partisan political reasons, that's just going to be a factor in our lives.
Q: Is there equally intense feeling on the other end of the spectrum?
A: It is, and it's very rewarding. I've certainly seen a lot of that in the last two months on my book tour. But I always believe that in America, the answer is usually to be found kind of in the quiet middle, where people are struggling actually to solve problems. That's what I try to remind myself of.
Q: Assuming that you're not going to be running yourself, as you've said many times, do any of the Democratic presidential hopefuls look good for 2004?
A: Absolutely. We have a number of really qualified, experienced candidates running. I believe . . . as voters get to know these people a little better, somebody will emerge who will have a very good chance of defeating the incumbent for a second term. That's important, because we're heading in the wrong direction as a country.
Q: Which is harder: a political campaign or a book tour?
A: They're both kind of challenging, because you have to travel fast and meet a lot of people quickly. They are, in my experience anyway, equally rewarding. I love being out there and hearing what's on people's minds.
Q: You do appear to actually be enjoying this.
A: I really am. I've had a great time. . . . I've also learned a lot. I mean, people go through the lines and tell me what they're thinking about -- every issue under the sun and what should be done about it in the United States Senate. [She laughs.]
Q: You weren't exactly known for your sense of humor when you were first lady, but it has become a little more apparent since then. How important is a sense of humor in politics?
A: Well, I've always had one. [She laughs.] I guess I didn't have much chance to display it during the very difficult, challenging eight years of Bill's administration. But I don't see how you get through the day, let alone life, without a sense of humor. You have to be able to laugh at yourself and nearly everything else that's going on around you.
Q: Do you think politics is still a noble profession?
A: Absolutely. It's not only noble, it's essential, especially in a democracy. That is how we make decisions about what we're going to do together as a society. I worry about some of the decisions that are being made in Washington these days because I don't think they're the right ones for our country. So, it's not only noble, it's absolutely critical that people be willing to become involved in the political process.
Q: What do you read for pleasure?
A: Right now I'm reading this wonderful new biography of Katharine Hepburn. For someone of my vintage who loved watching her on the screen, it's a joy to read.
....
Q: Have you read the other blockbuster book this summer: Harry Potter?
A: You know, I'm reading the Harry Potter series to my nephew right now, because I hadn't read them yet. But now that Harry and I have been together now [on best seller lists and in store events], I figured I'd better know what's going on in his life.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
Not high up enough in the corporate food chain - har!
Will be listening to FredomPoster this a.m., though. He rocks!
*Bites* doesn't it?
Enjoy your Monday, anyway!
I've said several times I think the devil gag is ok, I have even suggested it to people. I have also said that I think it is somewhat vague. Just because people can read your sign in 3 seconds deosn't mean it makes a connection with them. It doesn't reference any of Hillary's own scandals that may ring a bell with people, nor tie her to the general corruption of the Clinton administration.
Our goal at any Hillary FReep should be to reinforce a negative about her in swing voters minds. We want them to think "Oh yes, I remember her taking the White House silverware" or "I almost forgot about all those questionable pardons".
The devil connection has about as much effect as having a sign that says "Hillary is a witch". It will connect with hard core conservatives, but their vote is probably already in the bag. Middle of the road voters would just as likely reject it as some kind of a personal attack by Clinton haters or the VRWC, and may have the opposite effect of setting her up as a victim.
None of my comments have been offered as an attack on anyone. They are simply suggestions or positive criticism to help people get the most out of their signs and message they are projecting at their rallies.
I would also suggest not using any references to the "VRWC". The general public thought she was a little paranoid over that, no sense suggesting flesh and blood members are actually out there. It's better if Hillary is the only one mentioning that phrase, it makes her look kooky.
One question you and the other FReepers committing their time and money to this event need to ask is what is your goal? If the goal is to put questions about her in the minds of swing voters who may be voting on her presidency one day, then attack her credibility be reminding them of her own scandals and idiocy. If the goal is to get in Hillary's face or make her "uncomfortable, than by all means throw Bill at her.
Keep in mind that the second option, while personally satisfying, might not have any long term political or strategic vale.
What's that supposed to mean?!?
I don't know why but I can't stop laughing at this tag line.
I wonder, maybe for some of these people, it may not be a mask! :)
LOL! (No, she's just been very cranky ever since that house fell on her sister.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.