Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomB
Consistency was never one of your strong points, was it?

Reasoning is surely not one of yours.

If Saddam was already armed and already in touch with Al Queda and already burning with a desire to do us harm what does Bush mean when he says the threat is not immediate?

53 posted on 08/09/2003 10:02:27 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: liberallarry
If Saddam was already armed and already in touch with Al Queda and already burning with a desire to do us harm what does Bush mean when he says the threat is not immediate?

Saddam was ALREADY armed, and ALREADY dealing with Al Qaeda and ALREADY wanting to do us harm since the first Gulf War. Those facts have NOTHING to do with the threat being imminent.

56 posted on 08/09/2003 10:06:57 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: liberallarry
what does Bush mean when he says the threat is not immediate?

Probably the same thing you meant when you said the threat was not imminent.

103 posted on 08/09/2003 5:39:19 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson