LOL! I don't need to say it because you just did in the previous paragraph!
But then he goes on to say that, while the threat is not imminent we must act anyway.
Consistency was never one of your strong points, was it?
Reasoning is surely not one of yours.
If Saddam was already armed and already in touch with Al Queda and already burning with a desire to do us harm what does Bush mean when he says the threat is not immediate?