[liberallarry]

Tell that to Bob Graham. He stated in October, 2002 that Iraq was attempting to develop a nuke program.

So what? Attempting? What does that mean? How far along were they? How effective was deterrance and inspection? If the evidence was so clear why didn't everyone interpret it in the same way?

Tell your revisionist history to other dims

Try not to be a complete ignoramus. There is no canonical history of these events yet...so there's no revisionist history. Everything is current.

[Twinkie]

"I had to bomb that aspirin factory in - oops! - the wrong
country on the same day that Monica testified in court for
reasons of national security."

[arkfreepdom]

Oh, I see, it's OK to say something just not act on it. Now that's a recipe for effective leadership.

And yes it is revisionist to say Bush was saying anything that everyone else wasn't saying about Iraq...that's the revision part and you know it. And lay off the ignoramus part. You don't know me or my intelligence or lack of...typical liberal elitist....call someone names when your argument is weak.

[beckett]

If the evidence was so clear why didn't everyone interpret it in the same way?

You can't be serious. That's a candidate for one of the most dimwitted comments I've seen on FR.