Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squantos; harpseal; Travis McGee; Shooter 2.5; Centurion2000; Poohbah; El Gato; All
POW-POW-POW-POW!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Whatchoo guys think?

3 posted on 08/07/2003 10:57:08 AM PDT by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: All
Here's the HK-36, upon which the XM-8 will be based:


6 posted on 08/07/2003 10:59:32 AM PDT by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut
"Whatchoo guys think?"

Well, it's certainly futuristic looking, but is it actually an effective weapon?

16 posted on 08/07/2003 11:06:05 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut
That wait a minute vine catcher (flash supressor) on the front has to go.... bird cage versus old three prong snag on everything in the bush. The weaver rail is fine but the handle is something that I personally never liked . ect ect .....wheres the bayonet lug ?....selector lever is on wrong side for good ergonomics (IMO). Barrel looks too thin (again) to break ammo crate steel bands........from the pic alone thats all I will judge.

I'd like to see a scadnium/titanium reciever to reduce weight and compensate the normal weight with ammo, weapons sights, grenade launcher ect ect.

Stay Safe

54 posted on 08/07/2003 11:44:24 AM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut
I think we need to find out how it operates in all ckinds of envirornments. Since it will fire 5.56 X 45 mm Nato thereis no change in cartridge. Other than that it seems very similar to the M16 in overall appearance and finction from jsut reading the specs.

I ahve not yet fired one so I can have no opinion on it as reggards accuracy and reliability.

85 posted on 08/07/2003 12:31:14 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut
Whatchoo guys think?

It is uglier than its predecessor. When I go to Camp Perry and see the Army and Marine rifle teams shooting this piece, it will be time to sit down and have a good cry.

330 posted on 09/01/2003 6:14:23 AM PDT by SSN558 (Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremacists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut; SLB; dcbryan; Travis McGee; TEXASPROUD; harpseal
Heckler & Koch'ish little thang with a wait'a minute vine catcher on the end and an adjustable butt for lenght of pull issues for body armor and cold weather gear adjustments. Hopefully that selector lever is ambi for right and left versus just the shown right side. Lose the carry handle and replace with just a flat top weaver rail ...... as the average troop will use optical aimpoint, ACOG, Night vision , or thermal scopes ect ect sights in the future. Getting a proper cheek weld for accurate shots is a problem with that handle and the additional height of a scope.

The lanyard /sling hole in the bottom of the butt stock should be moved to the top of the butt to facilitate a better carry /ready position and delete the torque factors applied by the twisting and pulls that current sling arraingements have on the M4's, XM-177's and older GAU5A/AA SMG versions.

Make the furniture in camo patterns to preclude the need to "improvise" with paints that can emit "odors" in some environments. Make provisions for carrying a second ammunition magazine on the weapon in addition to the primary in the mag well.

Make use of the scandium and titanium and carbon fiber materials to "start" the weapons weight off at 4.5 pounds and with the addition of full magazine/s, grenade launcher and optics and sling brings the fully operational rig to under 7 pounds.

Whatever caliber is selected (243 or 223) keep a kinetic kill capability versus the attempt to make a 800 +/- meter max effective range heavier round. Drop the ball ammo requirements and use modern bullet designs with horrific stopping properties for MOUT and CQB. We can and have used hollowpoint ammo in the "terrorism" fight vs the declared war which seems to be a thing of the past these days.

The ball ammo was considered humane and also wounded the enemy to create a logistic nightmare of wounded troops to bleed the enemy that cared about their fellow soldiers with regards to moral and materials and POL supplies. The terroristic enemies we engage in the future in LIC missions have no concern for their troops and must be delt a death blow from the moment encountered IMHO.

BAYONET LUG............Psycological effect of fixed bayonets still has a place in modern "nation building" and FUBAR possibilities of logistic resupply going to wrong address.

That's my personal opinion of the new and improved.........:o)

Stay safe !

361 posted on 09/17/2003 5:01:13 AM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson