Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drjimmy
No, I don't think that is, but that isn't the issue. As a matter of law, I don't see how the federal government has the authority to order him to take down the ten commandments, any more than they would have the authority to demand he take down a plaque that said "World's Greatest Dad".
10 posted on 08/07/2003 7:25:53 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Bird
.....As a matter of law.....

The Judge seems to be arguing that congress passed no law. If that is true, how did he lose in court? The ACLU argued something in court. What law did the ACLU argue and what did the judges rule on that specific point of law.

34 posted on 08/07/2003 8:55:07 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson