[Dataman]

I don’t favor homosexuality, and personally find it repugnant, but the above argument doesn’t wash with me.

It's really, really simple: If God created us, we have His opinion, if the universe created itself and rocks created us, we're supposed to have natural selection and survival of the fittest. Either way, homos are either against God or against nature (or both).

[Bluntpoint]

On CBS right now there is evidence that the cover up of church scandals came from rome.

[whattajoke]

If God created us, we have His opinion, if the universe created itself and rocks created us, we're supposed to have natural selection and survival of the fittest. Either way, homos are either against God or against nature (or both).

You said yourself, "It's really, really simple." yes, dataman, your worldview is apparently a bit too simple. I know you believe the Judeo-Christian god created Adam and Eve and everything else in Genesis. Fine. I'll ignore the inherent silliness of the resulting generations of incest that would have been necessary with that (and a few thousand years later after the great flood). I'll even ignore your thinly veiled jab of evolution, because I think your ignorance is readily apparent (where on earth did you get the notion that "rocks created us?!")

However, my worldview is a bit more complicated because I believe everything isn't so black and white. Homo sapiens come in all stripes, some straight, some gay, some in between. Some male, more female, with all kinds of in-betweens. I hate that I'm sounding a tad liberal here, but it's true.