Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dataman
If God created us, we have His opinion, if the universe created itself and rocks created us, we're supposed to have natural selection and survival of the fittest. Either way, homos are either against God or against nature (or both).

You said yourself, "It's really, really simple." yes, dataman, your worldview is apparently a bit too simple. I know you believe the Judeo-Christian god created Adam and Eve and everything else in Genesis. Fine. I'll ignore the inherent silliness of the resulting generations of incest that would have been necessary with that (and a few thousand years later after the great flood). I'll even ignore your thinly veiled jab of evolution, because I think your ignorance is readily apparent (where on earth did you get the notion that "rocks created us?!")

However, my worldview is a bit more complicated because I believe everything isn't so black and white. Homo sapiens come in all stripes, some straight, some gay, some in between. Some male, more female, with all kinds of in-betweens. I hate that I'm sounding a tad liberal here, but it's true.
76 posted on 08/07/2003 1:33:53 PM PDT by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: whattajoke
"I hate that I'm sounding a tad liberal here"

Liberals have a complicated view of the facts and conservatives have a "really, really simple" worldview?

That's disheartening. I was going to cite GW as a counter-example, but I wasn't sure it would be convincing.
77 posted on 08/07/2003 1:39:10 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: whattajoke
Fine. I'll ignore the inherent silliness of the resulting generations of incest that would have been necessary with that (and a few thousand years later after the great flood).

Fine. I'll ignore your ignorance of history and point out that incest wasn't taboo originally. The gene pool wasn't degraded at first. Evolution, OTOH, has a male or a female evolving without the benefit of a partner of the opposite sex. That is silliness. The flood required incest? If marrying your cousin (there was no one else in existence) is incest, Charlie Darwin was an incestuous beast since he couldn't get anyone to marry him EXCEP his cousin (and there were other women in existence).

(where on earth did you get the notion that "rocks created us?!")

Your own public school science texts teach that it rained on rocks for millions of years which created the environment for the "complex chemical soup" that gave rise to life. Perhaps I should have said "rain and rocks created man."

122 posted on 08/08/2003 6:44:31 AM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson