Homosexuality serves no useful purpose

barbadosadvocate.com ^

[chance33_98]

Homosexuality serves no useful purpose

Gilbert Williams’ outrageous lies about homosexuality among dumb animals is simply shameful. Homosexuality comprises a barren act that serves no useful purpose in nature, therefore no collection of living creatures whether man or animal, can sustain themselves from generation to generation exclusively through this practice – it brings death. Furthermore, since when do we look to animals for guidance on sexual morality: animals routinely practice incestuous relationships, polygamy and spousal abuse. Does Gilbert Williams, suggest we do the same?

Additionally, if homosexual acts were also practiced among animals, then such acts would be readily observed by all and sundry and there is no need to learn of such accounts in books.

Besides, if homosexual unions were historically so acceptable, natural and as commonplace as Mr. Williams claims then, how and why did it come to pass that homosexuality is universally outlawed, until recently, in all countries and condemned by all major religions?

Now consider this Ken Scott: a 1978 American study found that 43 per cent of male homosexuals estimated they had sex with more than 500 partners and 28 per cent had more than 1 000 partners (clearly a neurosis); the incidence of sexually transmitted disease (including hepatitis) was seven times higher among homosexuals and in some categories it was as high as 20 times; the life expectancy from all causes of homosexual males was 43, and with the advent of AIDS, it is now 39. A BBC report of June 26, 2003 mentioned that the incidence of AIDS among homosexuals was ten times higher than that in the general population; and 52 per cent of the AIDS cases in the US are among homosexuals. In summary, homosexuality is unhealthy and condemns our young men to an early grave. Given these glaring statistics, opposing the homosexual cause is neither stupid nor ignorant.

The laws of Barbados permit marriage between one man and one woman, which is as much a prescription against homosexuality as it is against bigamy. It applies equally to every man and woman. There is no discrimination; it protects every one equally. The law must not be changed because you do not feel good obeying it.

The book “Religious Apartheid” quoted statistics which revealed that 75 per cent of all paedophiles in the US are homosexual. Mr. Scott’s assertion that most homosexuals abhor child abuse rings hollow since I am yet to hear organisations such as Lambada, GLAD or ACT-up publicly denounce NAMBLA for its public policy of molesting little eight-year-old boys. What you do not say also condemns you.

Homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt children; the trauma and shame visited on children raised by two “mummies” or two “daddies” should not be a burden society imposes on children. Children are not pet puppies who need only to be fed and housed; they also need moral and spiritual guidance. Children should not be recruited into a social experiment to further the political agenda of militant homosexuals. If homosexuals truly wished to have and to care for children they would forgo their homosexual lifestyles and enter stable heterosexual relationships since American surveys indicate that less than one per cent of homosexuals are exclusively homosexual, which means that they can and do perform sexually with someone of the opposite sex.

We do not need the psuedo-science of sociologists, psychiatrists or psychologists to tell us that homosexuality is wrong; they masquerade ideology as science. The “Bible” condemns homosexuality in the strongest terms and that is enough for us.

Ken Scott, God did not make you a homosexual. Your homosexuality is the result of a deprivation neurosis and in trying to deal with that neurosis you have developed an inordinate sexual attachment or attraction to other men just as other people in dealing with a neurosis they develop an inordinate attachment to people, objects or substances. For the homosexual is insecure in his gender identity and in his confusion he attempts to attach himself to someone of the same sex in an effort to attain an identity. It is a disordered love. However, you have chosen to believe the lies of psychologists.

People are not born with a disposition that is impossible to change – even dumb animals are trained to conduct themselves in ways that run counter to their natures. If homosexuality is accepted because of sexual orientation, then there is no sensible reason to reject paedophilia or bestiality since these too can be regarded as sexual orientation.

Ken Scott, thank you for not coming to Barbados and please discourage others of your homosexual persuasion not to visit. Rejecting immorality is discrimination.

[tractorman]

Are all Libertarians Godless pigs or just you?

[dagnabbit]

I was just noting that the Russian pop duo "TATU" effectively used the appearance of homosexuality to market themselves. I, of course, have no opinion on any of their other merits ;-)

[ConsistentLibertarian]

What would Jesus do?

There's a safe way for gay men to have "intercourse", it was widespread among the ancient greeks (guys like Socrates and Plato and their drinking buddies), and it's pretty much on a par with guys getting off on a woman's breasts, which I have never heard God or the President suggest was a Bad Thing To Do.

Of course I could be wrong. Maybe God or the President have both spoken about the grave immorality of men getting off on a woman's breasts. So correct me if I'm wrong and pass me the link.

But given the facts, I think Jesus would want to tell people about safe sex. Maybe that's what the Bible was getting at ... it's no good if you don't do it right ... Maybe the Bible itself is warning gay men to "Go Greek" as it were.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

You'd be amazed at what young Russian girls do to "market themselves" ;-)

[scripter]

Thanks for the pings. I thought I pinged everyone to this list once but it looks like I missed it. With so many homosexual threads lately it's difficult to keep up.

Homosexual Agenda Index

Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe or unsubscribe from my homosexual agenda ping list.

[GSWarrior]

It's called frottage, dammit. Must you be so descriptive.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

Thanks, I'd never heard that word before.

So is frottage gravely immoral? On a moral scale from -10 to +10 is it tied with anal intercourse or does it score a bit higher?

[MattAMiller]

Celibacy does not result in premature death to its practioners. Counter?

Neither does homosexuality. AIDS causes premature death, but there are several activities that cause AIDS.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

"Celibacy does not result in premature death to its practioners. Counter?"

If a guy takes a vow of celibacy, is he allowed to masturbate five times or more a week for decades?

If not, he's risking premature death from prostrate cancer.

[MEG33]

Prostate

[ConsistentLibertarian]

Thanks Meg :-)

[NonZeroSum]

I doubt that homosexuality has a purpose (though why it matters whether it does or not is unclear to me, since many human traits don't "have a purpose").

I suspect that when we finally come to understand this problem it will turn out to be a side effect of combinations of genes that each, in themselves, is beneficial, but when unfortunately combined results in homosexual orientation. The genes continue to be passed on because heterosexuals carry them as well, gaining whatever benefits accrue when they're not combined.

[MEG33]

Your welcome...;)

[Trailerpark Badass]

Does masturbation have no useful purpose? I'm really curious how y'all feel about masturbation.

Masturbation, possibly, can help prevent prostate cancer.

Oh, and I'm not sure if I count as "y'all," at least not when a Yankee says it.

[Trailerpark Badass]

Certain cancers of the male reproductive system are very prevalent among Catholic priests and religious who do not masturbate. Just as breast cancers are statistically higher among nuns.

Sure.

[GSWarrior]

So is frottage gravely immoral?

Not if it's done correctly.

Seriously, I have enough problems running my own life without having to worry much about what others take part in, as long as no one is harmed and the acts are consensual.

[breakem]

prostrate cancer was quite commion in countries which had a monarchy. It is caused by excessive bowing.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

"I have enough problems running my own life without having to worry much about what others take part in, as long as no one is harmed and the acts are consensual."

Word.

[ConsistentLibertarian]

"prostrate cancer was quite commion in countries which had a monarchy. It is caused by excessive bowing."

Really? I wonder if masturbating ten or fifteen or twenty times a week would have compensated for that risk factor.