Replies

Maybe this DA should shut his mouth and let the evidence stand for itself!

The article is based on court papers not on press conference.

The problem is the DA has been on TV as well as every lawyer who wants face time that isn't even involved.

For that reason, I haven't followed the case -- let the facts speak for themselves. Calling something a slam dunk is a sure way to prejudice a jury and get it thrown out.

Dumb and dumber if you ask me. Just let the evidence stand and have the press quit trying to find every source they can so they can go on the TV with breaking news. It is prejudicing a jury with all this reporting hour after hour. BTW, I think he is probably guilty but in this Country there used to be some semblence of "innocent until proven guilty" but that seems to have flown out the window with cable news -- all of them!